patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Avon Lake School Levy Defeated

Personnel will be cut, superintendent says.

 

A 5-year, 9.04-mill Emergency Levy for the Avon Lake school district failed Nov. 6, losing 6519 to 5815.

“It was a good race,” Avon Lake Superintendent of Schools Bob Scott said. “We knew it was a large number and we tried to get our story out as much as we could.

“Well go back to the drawing board tomorrow.”

Scott said the district will begin making decisions on when to come back to the voters.

“The deficit is not going away,” Scott said.

The district has another, separate levy coming up in May 2013.

Next for the district is determining where cuts will need to be made.

“We’re going know fairly quickly what the dollar amount is we have to cut,” Scott said. “It will be personnel. That’s what we have to work on, that’s a process.

“The disappointment is that we’re an outstanding school and I think that could be in jeopardy now.”

Had the levy passed, it would have cost property owners $277 more per $100,000 home valuation.

Levy supporters created a Facebook page, held informational meetings and a website to disseminate information.

*All results are unofficial until certified by the Lorain County Board of Elections.

Related Topics: Avon Lake, Levy, and election 2012

Jennifer Williams

6:58 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Such a tragedy. Our kids are our future and our schools are stellar. Now, the second is in jeopardy. Very disappointed.

Reply

AvonLaker1234

7:27 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Wow...Cleveland can pass a Levy...but Avon Lake can't? How sad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

C Clay

11:28 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I read an article about how renters may have had a heavy influence in the turnout in Cleveland. Wonder the percentage of renters compared to Avon Lake

Sergent7

7:43 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I am so surprised. I lived in Avon Lake for years, and I've never known them not to pass a school levy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jamie K

3:31 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

These are tough times. The cost of living has increased but salaries have not. How much more can they squeeze out of us?

Comment_arrow

Jim Brady

8:24 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

What - did he come here and vote against the levy? The funding of schools was long broken before our current governor.

Shoreman19

8:07 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Instead of potential layoffs, how about some concessions to keep the shop afloat until next time. Employees that have their eyes truly set upon a greater good and a rebirth of their passion for their chosen profession, would consider that.

Reply

AVONALKER1

8:07 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Get rid of some of the old teachers, let some new ones come in and teach.
It is cheaper !
Get the teachers in classrooms and not at lowes and home depot working on there homes and other places around town !
Why do so many teachers have free periods (more than one)?
Why do we need teachers sitting in other classrooms that are not theres ? (to many free periods) Nothing to do with there time .

It seems they just have to much time on there hands and too many teachers on staff.
Maybe look at the treasures and others pay ! (maybe a little to much)
I think we can save in several areas in our schools in AL!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris Lash

11:37 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Free periods are very important because planning lessons and grading papers takes a lot longer than you probably think. Teaching is not just a 9-5 job, it goes home with you. Free periods help with that and it also allows time to have private tutoring sessions with struggling students.

Comment_arrow

Cwh

2:05 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I agree with Chris Lash. I as well as many of my colleagues spend all of our "free" periods helping students. We scarf our lunch down in 15 minutes and get right back to planning and helping kids reach their potential. Many of us work 10 hrs or more a day and take work home. The average person has no idea how much time we spend on our jobs.

Comment_arrow

Terska

11:11 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

You should have paid more attention in class. You don't know how to spell.
People like you are ruining the teaching profession. These people are some of the most important people in the lives of our children. Do you really want to reduce it to a low wage job? Do you seek out the least experienced and cheapest doctor or lawyer too?
Now watch your home value plummet.

Comment_arrow

jeff moore

1:53 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

you are a idiot!Do us all a favor and move.

Buck98

8:38 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The only good news of the day.

Reply

Myron Thomas

8:44 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Why is it a tragedy? Last time I heard school was open this morning....Like practically everyone in this country the board will have to re-align it's priorities and do some heavy cutting. Get back to the basics of educating children. Which is their job.
Maybe it would have been wise to ask for more operating money a few years ago instead of requesting bonds for things that were not needed. It appears over the last few years the emphasis was on improving the stadium and adding a bus garage. And yes I know they come from completely different funding pools.
Everyone knew cuts in state and local funds were in the district's future and yet the focus appeared to be on ill-advised infrastructure.
I distinctly remember the argument of increased opportunities for events at the stadium and I may be wrong but did that happen? I don't think it did..Did some additional revenue come to the school system because of all of these "supposed" extra events?
The only thing that should of been asked for, and appropriately, was classroom expansion. And they did and have accomplished that.
Trim the fat. Get back to the basics and prepare for even more cuts in federal and state assistance....

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

10:09 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This is only the first levy I have NOT supported in 27 years of voting associated with direct education impact (in other words, excluding the bus garage, stadium and other addresses). The district felt in "imperative" to focus to focus on those previous items. IF the district did not do some of those previous items - this probably would have passed. Mr. Scott is more of the problem than the solution.

Mr. Scott was quoted in the PD (paraphrase) that they'll just have to go back to the taxpayers. Haven't you heard us loud and clear (twice?). Make some reasonable cuts. Unions can make some concessions (as many are in today's environment) and they'll be just fine. Gosh forbid the city council do something to get more business in town to make up for the upcoming loss of the power plant (or EPA extends the deadline).

Comment_arrow

Becky R

6:18 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I agree with George Z...I do whatever I can to support our schools. But I could not justify this levy at this time.

Dave D

8:45 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This was a rather large bite out of everyone's wallet. The average homeowner would pay $50-60 more a MONTH! I think a combination of pay and benefit concessions, and a smaller mill increase would be more in order. Right now, many residents are experiencing pay and benefit cutbacks. I know it's not the school employees asking for more that is causing this fiscal crisis, ut it is here, and everyone has to work together to solve this.

I

Reply

Leslie K

9:00 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Shameful. Time to move on and regroup for May.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jamie K

4:00 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Shameful? Really? Shameful of YOU to expect us to empty our pockets when ever your buddies need money. Not sure which part of Avon Lake you live where apparently money fall from tree's. Maybe your next levy will can pay for my new garage door, my new heater and my new stove. Take your group to another city like Bay Village where they need more levy's. Not if you noticed but the cost of Milk, Bread and Gas have increased but salaries have decreased. In many cases people have part-time positions. Shameful? You also do realize that Obama won yesterday! Yeah... now he's going to increase our Federal Taxes which means more money gone. Where is this magical tree you and your friends own?

Jim

9:14 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yep. Cut personnel! The administrators, NOT the teachers! This is exactly why I voted NO! We do have the best teachers of any district anywhere, but the wasteful spending on things in our district sickens me. Until they get priorities straight I will never vote yes on the levy!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Brady

9:49 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

What are some of the wasteful things? I'm just curious.

Comment_arrow

Ashley Riddle

10:42 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

They are cutting teachers, so thanks.

Sue H

9:30 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This was the best news of the day.
An additional $277 tax per $100,000 home valuation increase is a HUGE amount of money for the average taxpayer.
Most people look at 9 mils as quite excessive and over-the-line greedy. We all want the best education opportunities for the children of Avon Lake. Please, school district finance folks, tighten your belts, quit spewing threats of "cuts" as scare tactics for students and parents. Our finance folks need to get realistic and smarter about the money the homeowners of good city already do provide to an admittedly excellent school district.

Reply

Kristen LePrevost

10:00 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

We moved here recently for the school systems..but it doesn't seem to be much of a priority for a lot of citizens who worry more about their taxes...it's making me a bit nervous...strong schools are the base for any successful community...

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

10:15 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I completely agree (& voted against). The district has repeatedly asked for more & more money. This was a combination (IMO) of too many times asking, refusal to make the real cuts, size of increase, doing the wrong things at the wrong time (think garage, HS beautification & stadium). Those items are important, but it was known then that funding would probably be cut. The districts clear opinion of "we'll just raise taxes" has now been met with -- be reasonable & responsible, you are not..

I am confident this city will support our schools. We can't keep raising our tax rate and become Bay Village (people avoid because they are too high compared to other communities).

I am glad we seemed to have stopped supporting them blindly. Be reasonable, they've been to the till to many time of recent years.

Comment_arrow

Myron Thomas

10:16 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Kristen,
Thankfully for you it appears you could afford this increase. Some can't. The later is the group I belong too. It doesn't mean we do not care. Some just ca't make the money appear out of no where.
I do not believe there is a law that forbids you from heading up the board offices and scratching a check.

Comment_arrow

Becky R

6:27 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Kristen,
Personally, I have supported every other levy and vote for support to the school system. We recently completed renovations to the football stadium, built a new bus garage and completed expansions on several of the schools. I think it was too early to ask for that much more from residents. The teachers and programs deserve our support, but I didn't feel confident in the plan for this new levy. Give me something that I feel good about, don't just ask for more money.

JT1257

10:28 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Strong schools are the basis for a good community, and when a district loses $7.5 million in state and local tax funding something has to be done to make up that loss. It's so easy to say people should do givebacks ... but the same people saying they don't want an increase in their taxes are asking others to take a cut in their pay. Where's the logic? And what cutbacks are going to make up that amount of money? Perhaps a smaller levy with a few givebacks is in order, but if folks don't understand this puts the schools and the city in crisis mode, their heads are in the sand. The schools are one of our prized assets. They provide an education that is second to none, with a wide variety of opportunities and curricula. It's a special education that gives our kids a fabulous start. Instead of crying about a teacher rightly using a free period to help kids, let's focus on the good the schools do and we can and should do to maintain it. It's not the schools' fault Kasich wiped out funding with a pen, or that the power plant will close. It is our fault as a community, though, if we ignore the realities and cheat our kids. And we'll all pay.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

10:38 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

JT1257 -

You blast "us" for not supporting a levy that would have increased my tax bill by ~ $800 (my house is very close to the average house listed in prior articles). The point here is that despite widespread info that tax cuts were coming (half of the equation) the district chose to spend money that some felt inappropriate (garages, beautification, stadium). You may not agree and that's OK -- in these times (& our household has taken pay cuts already so I don't think it unreasonable for the overall district payroll to do the same = it is 82% of the overall budget). However, there are many items they can do first before it comes to that.

Education first, all others second. Look at all the items being done, seems they keep wanting to build the castle bigger???!!!????

Comment_arrow

opinionsarelikenoses

10:58 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I have to say we have a great superintendent and teaching group. Anyone criticizing what they do and how they do it should walk in their shoes or go educate themselves to go do it better.

Comment_arrow

JT1257

2:59 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

George,

I would never argue with a man or family that simply cannot afford it. I might offer that the price we pay in the long run might be higher than simply rejecting the levy. That being said, every vote is an individual choice that I respect.

For the record, I know what cutbacks are like. I lost my job and had to take a 60 percent paycut in a new one. I'm cobbling things together to keep my house, but it's my opinion that the levy was worth it because it was worth spending it on our kids. I'll give up a couple more things for their sake.

I respect your feelings that there may be places to cut. I'm not expert enough to point them out, though. Overall, my experience with the schools and the education that my kids receive has been excellent. In fact, it's special. I'd hate to see our community lose that, because it's a big part of what makes Avon Lake strong. In my opinion. As for the building, I'm under the impression that operating money comes from a different pot than capital improvement. Too, those improvements were voted on by the community, and those votes passed.

This one is about education ... in the classroom education and programs and advanced programs and depth and breadth of education. And it lost. I'd rather put the money for my kids than anything ... but that's me. Apologies if it seemed I was blasting you. That was not the intent.

Jennifer Williams

10:39 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I do not consider stellar teachers, manageable class sizes, busing, enrichment opportunities (like choir and art), and honors programming for our advanced, soon-to-be significant contributors to society to be "fat". The tragedy is that these are but some of the areas you will see cuts if this levy fails again in May. I was not a resident of AL when some feel the emphasis was not on the education side of things, but I am saddened that the kids will have to suffer for it now because of past misjudgments.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JT1257

2:51 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Well stated Jennifer. Well stated.

Dan LaVigne

11:04 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Cut the following salaries:
1) Superintendent $117,500.00
2) Treasurer $87,000.00
3) High School Principal $116,125.00
4) Combine salaries for Asst. High School Principals $160,00.00 eliminate one of these
5) Athletic Director $102,169.00
6) Asst. Learwood Principal $88,196.00 eliminate person
Look at some of the sport teams and eliminate some, Education first Sports second

Reply
Comment_arrow

opinionsarelikenoses

11:49 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Dan your the same guy on other forums complaining about high CEO salaries and how our union workers and teachers should be the ones making these salaries. Now you say cut them?...I'm convinced You really like to see your name on the forums, and the Press and the Sun newspaper. Your hypocrisy proceeds you.

Comment_arrow

JT1257

3:01 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Let's suppose all those salaries are cut 10 percent. The total, generously: $70,000. How is that going to make up for losing millions from the state?

Comment_arrow

Terska

11:29 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

These ideas are not very helpful. You need to figure out how to cut $4 million from the budget that was lost due to Kasich removing funding and the closing of the power plant.
Did you know that St. Joe's gets more money per student from the state than the AL city schools?

MARY SCHUERGER

11:11 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Check into why we are in the hole already! Mr.Scott said this levy wasn't suppose to be on the ballot till 2017? Cut the secretaries out first and people not needed. Our athletics director doesn't need more than 1 secretary, a strange man doesn't have to come to my house every month to check if I live there, a strange man sitting in his car that works for the schools sitting in the high school parking lot ! LET CLEAN HOUSE!!! LETS MAKE MR. SCOTT ACCOUNTABLE!

Reply

Towners

11:11 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Levies were passed to pay for the school betterments, bus garage, and new stadium. These finds could not be used for operating expenses. If people attended the board meetings you would see how the budget is managed. Avon Lake appears to be a responsible school district and it is amazing that Cleveland passed their levy, but we could not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

11:29 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Good ideas but bad timing. Left a bad opinion about future levy's.

Cleveland hasn't passed anything for 15 yrs. We've passed most that have come across our ballots in last 15. (Well > 50%, I'd guesstimate 80%).

BAD comparison.

Myron Thomas

11:14 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

A stellar teacher does not become a bad teacher because of a failed levy. If they do then you don't want them anyway.
I'm hip to the choir and art stuff. I am probably wrong but the expense for those should be manageable.
The first good cut is sports.... Gone. All of it. Or 100 percent pay to play for EVERY activity. If you think Johnny or Jenny is going to be the next top professional, then feel free to pay for all of it then. Coaches... Coaching for free... If they have a true "passion" for their specific game, They'd do it for free...Could save a lot of scratch there in my opinion.
That's a good start....
My responsibility is to pay for kid's education. Not athletic achievement. I will glady pony up cash for buses, advanced placement classes, and so forth.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Brady

1:45 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Families are paying out of pocket for sports through pay-to-participate. Your point is invalid.

Comment_arrow

Cwh

2:21 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

No one is going to coach a sport for free. You have no idea the level of dedication and time that it takes to coach even one middle school sport per year. The amount you get paid works out to about 30 cents per hour. The Chinese employees that got jobs in China from jobs Romney took through Bain Capital make more than that!

Comment_arrow

Myron Thomas

3:05 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jim Brady,
The point is valid
Understand the entire statement. I said pay for their ENTIRE cost, 100%, to participate in any and ALL sports. Not some blanket $200.00 for all sport participation.
Simply stated, like this...If football costs 800 per kid to field a team and the kid runs track and it costs 300 per kid to field, the parent owes 1100. Seems pretty valid to me...

Comment_arrow

Ashley Riddle

10:45 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Good thing the school just rebuilt the football stadium, right? I completely agree with you though. My fear is their going to cut out art. And more so, the teachers.

MARY SCHUERGER

11:31 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

MR. SCOTT NEEDS TO EXPLAIN WHERE ALL THE MONEY IS GOING???? get rid of all the extra secretaries , men sitting in their cars at the high school...a man coming to my house every month to check if I live there!!! I been here for 7 YEARS!! QUIT WASTING MONEY!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JT1257

3:04 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Mr. Scott has explained it. It's right here. Go to the link and click on "click here..." It explains expenditures, the problem the school system faces and it shows that average teacher salaries are nowhere near the highest in comparable areas. Here is all you need to know.

http://www.avonlakeschoollevy.com/home

opinionsarelikenoses

11:59 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Mary, go to the meetings and find out instead of complaining...it's all out in the open. As for many of you others who can do it better, I am sure many of you are life long residents who's children enjoyed the great education the schools gave them while others who had no kids in the system helped pay the taxes. Now you see fit to demonize that same system? Without even understanding the issues and the costs?
How about we start addressing the spending in Washington instead of criticizing our local leaders/neighbors/friends. Instead we elected a President who just added $6 trillion in spending to our deficits. If you are the same who voted for this president once again please stop your opinions on this board because your hypocrites!

Reply
Comment_arrow

AvonLakeMom

12:17 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I couldn't agree more! Well said!

Jennifer Williams

12:00 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

No, a stellar teacher does not become a bad teacher because of a failed levy. He or she can, however, become an out of work teacher because of a failed levy, leaving the kids with class sizes that stretch even the greatest remaining teachers to their limits. I'm all for trimming admin positions that are not critical during a critical time. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem even that will make a marked dent in the amount needed to sustain critical programs. Hopefully, revisions can be made to the May proposal that will allow everyone to feel their needs have been respected and allow for a passage of the levy.

Reply

George Z

12:09 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Schools need to accept the fact that cuts need to be made. We might even need to increase class sizes or teachers have to pay some / more (?) for healthcare. The citizens have simply said enough. It is an economic reality that the state cut (because the money is not there) AND the Fed's a legislated the power plant out of existence. They can't continue on the path before these events happen.

Reply

Steve83

2:08 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The City of Avon Schools are rated Excellent with Distinction vs. Avon Lake as Excellent but City of Avon Schools spend only $7,181 per student for 2011 vs. Avon Lake City Schools $10,904 (reference Ohio Department of Education Finance group). That is a big difference without a good explanation as to why. Hard to vote for a levy that causes a 16% increase in real estate taxes without more information. I have no problem paying for good schools and good teachers - but prove that the school district is doing what it can to control all costs. Maybe come with a smaller levy this time. I for one found the numbers published by the schools didn't really add up until late in the campaign. Better information would have helped this election result out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JT1257

3:06 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This is a reasonable disagreement ... one that remains open if more and better information is provided. Hopefully that comes if the levy is brought back.

Jen G

2:30 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

It's amazing to me that people who know NOTHING about school finance chose to make statements about what and who needs to be cut.

Reply

Jennifer

4:18 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I would invite all of you with your ideas around what cuts should be made to attend the next school board meeting. My guess is that none of you have ever attended one before!

Reply

linda

5:09 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Here we go again! Insinuating the folks who can’t afford to pay such a large monthly increase and/or voted Democrat are insignificant and shouldn’t have a say on the board. Please, I am no transplant living in a brand new 350K+ home here, driving a number of SUV’s and can afford to toss money around. I can’t afford dance classes, gymnastics, cheerleading, personal trainers, etc either. But I stayed here because I care about the community and schools and want a quality education for my children. That doesn’t mean I have to price myself right out of here. A 9 mil levy is unreasonable. Comparing Avon Lake and Cleveland is ridiculous too, considering it took them 16 years to pass a levy. I never voted down a levy before, but I voted down the stadium-which has not generated any extra revenue and wasn’t an essential contribution to education. Initially, Scott said non-passage of the levy would affect AP classes, art and choir, but, when it fails there goes the flip flop--personnel must go. I don’t want to see anyone lose a job but if it’s possible to continue on without some, then that’s how it’s done-in every business. Don’t tell me to move either, my home has lost so much value that it's impossible and fact is, I don’t need to move just because you think only rich people should live here. .

Reply

linda

5:09 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This community already pays more in school fees than most other schools nearby, plus we have pay to play and no busing for the high school, yet- that’s not enough either. How about setting up bus stops instead of stopping at every corner -drive behind an AL school bus someday. Probably not a big money saver but frustrating and irrational all the same. Kind of like setting up school districts then giving parents the option to send their child to the school of their choice-duh!
Reading your reactions, one might think the sky is falling. Why would anyone who owns a home want to see the value decrease? Present a realistic levy and cut the fat instead of trying to eliminate budget changes by just replacing all the lost money and a levy will pass. Our kids aren’t suffering, trust me. Many successful people did not have a rich school system backing them up. One excessive levy voted down and we get “how sad….such a tragedy….the schools are in jeopardy….our property value is declining…..our kids are suffering…” Really?

Reply

Tim Allen

6:49 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

THE LEVY WAS GOING TO JUST BLEED PEOPLE OF THERE MONEY!!!!!!!
When i seen the salary of most of the teachers, it made me sick. My son hates 1/2 of the teachers, he said they are all awful. NO ONE CAN PAY ANYMORE!! DONE WITH ALL THE LEVIES THAT YOU KEEP PUSHING!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joseph Langford

9:08 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Sounds like your son is the problem. Because your son hates half his teachers and you are physically offended by teacher salaries - you vote no on a school levy. The other guy was more well suited to move to Avon. I think you should move to Sheffield Lake. You and your dis-respectful little man-child could move 4 miles west and he could live in your basement when you're 70.

Comment_arrow

Jen G

12:44 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Sounds like your son is the issue! I went to all 12 years of my schooling in Avon Lake....all 3 of my kids are in the Avon Lake school system. After graduating from Ohio University, I returned home so that I could send my kids to our schools. It is an AMAZING school system with OUTSTANDING teachers. The salary of teachers make you sick???? seriously?? Teachers have one of most important, difficult job there is. They devote their lives to educating and taking care of our/your children! The pay is not even close to what it should be. We should all be thankful for what we have in Avon Lake. I completely understand voting no because of the affordability issue. Voting no because you think the teachers get paid too much is absurd and shameful.

Erinn

10:19 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

My children are 4th generation Avon Laker's and I'm now thinking....time to move to Avon!

Reply

Get Real

11:17 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This levy deserved to fail. It was bloated excess. I am glad the voters finally said ENOUGH. This school district, board, and superintendent need to get a grip on reality. Enough moving dirt around it is pure EXCESS. It is time to cut and cut deep. There is excess staff and the salaries that are paid for some are exorbitant in this economy. It is time to get things in order. Learn how to live within a realistic budget. Everything new is not needed. It is time to learn to live without for a while and maybe then you can learn how to spend our money wisely instead of foolishly wasting it on EXCESSES...yes, that is right...new stadium...EXCESS. Moving dirt around at the high school...EXCESS. New bus garage...EXCESS. You got the nice to have's, now you may have to learn how to live within a realistic budget. Can't figure it out, go ask Avon...they are providing a better education to their students at much less per student. Here's a novel concept...can't figure out how to make the cuts...let's merge with Avon and cut ALL the Avon Lake administrators and go with the ones in Avon who can do it on much less.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

7:55 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Best idea I've heard yet !!

Comment_arrow

Joseph Langford

9:04 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Or you could just move to Avon?

ALHSAlumni

8:30 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

What about those teachers who are collecting pension FROM Avon Lake and are now collecting their pay check again?? Why is it that the school district thinks its ok to have allowed teachers to retire last year in time to come back for the football season this year? Allow new (and cheaper) teachers come in and teach? In many ways, these teachers are better prepared than the ones already in the district. I am not say get rid of the ones who are actually teaching your students but there are quite a few who are not doing their job. Or there are those teachers receiving supplemental pay and never really following what is in that job description? There are so many ways for the school district to find these funds with what Avon Lake is already giving them... Maybe they should take the Personal Business Skills course their guidance counselors like to push on the incoming freshmen.

Reply

Joseph Langford

9:12 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

This is what is great about America!!! Everyone who complains about where they live is free to move into a trailer in Sheffield Lake. The people who voted no obviously won in this race. When it comes time to vote again and IF the levy eventually passes you can A) shut up and pay or B) shut up and move

seems simple to me.

p.s I have never had children and never voted down a levy. From Now on I am going to vote no on them. I don't think your kids are worth it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

9:57 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Joe -

I should have to move because our schools take ~ 50% more per child (& you're insulted when the community says no to additional amounts)? My point is we use to be a cheap place to live vs. other areas (similar; not Sheffield). This tax would make us "high cost provider" and in my opinion, uncompetitive to other communities (Avon, River, Westlake). This higher cost in a prospective home owners eyes looking to move to here would trump our schools (they are very good also). Thus, our housing valuations would not go up as those more competitive area's. Again, this is the only levy I have voted against that could be directly tied to education vs. non-essentials (stadium, etc). Since you mentioned above you have no kids and go to the extremes of "I hate each and every one of you" -- I suspect I am arguing with a member of the administration. True? If so, hardly unbiased.

You can hate all you want. I don't think you grasp the whole picture.

Comment_arrow

George Z

10:31 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

~ 50% more than Avon schools do.

Joseph Langford

9:13 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I just want everyone to know I hate each and every one of you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MZ

8:39 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

That's a shame. All that hatred cannot be good for you.

Kristi

12:19 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I voted for the levy, but I do question how the money the ALCSD already has is being spent. It could not have been spent as efficiently as possible because they ask for more money all the time. The information sent around about the levy indicated that it would cost an average fo $53.00 a month for the average ($100,000.00 home value) homeowner. For my family, it would have cost 4x that - that's $212.00 a month. Very big expense. Like I said, I did end up voting for the levy, but I do understand why so many people didnt.

Reply

Kristi

12:22 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Also, I completely disagree with teachers needing a free period. First, is your free period worth cutitng academics like will not have to be done? Second, many professions require that work be taken home. I am a lawyer and always have work to do at home. I don't expect to be given a break by my employer during my regular work day so I can keep up. You all knew when you became a teacher that you'd have to grade papers and create lesson plans. Shame on you for claiming that free periods are necessary. They aren't necessary and they certainly aren't "free" as far as the school budget goes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Terska

12:30 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

A lawyer's starting salary is more than an experienced teacher makes. Teachers spend their free periods giving individual help to students.

They also spend time before and after school doing the same. I am still waiting too see a line of lawyers lined up to take teaching jobs because the pay and hours are better.

Kristi

12:39 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

It seems as though Terska has comppletely missed my point.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen G

12:52 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Absurd! I teach in another local school district and not only do I help children during my Planning Period (not "free period"), but I also help children during my lunch period. I get to work at 6:45 AM and stay until 3:30. I then go home and have a minimum of 2 hours grading and planning. No breaks, no free time.....

Comment_arrow

Terska

5:34 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Maybe I did. I thought you were making an unfair comparison of work loads between professions with a large disparity in typical salaries. Free periods are rest breaks. They are used for one on one teaching students needing help.

Comment_arrow

MZ

9:15 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jen, thanks for your service in educating our children. I hope it is a calling for you and that you aren't doing it for the money. With that said, please keep in mind that there are litteraly thousands of out of work teachers, and new graduates who would be happy to trade places with you.

Keep up the good work, keep things in perspective and be the best you can be for the kids you teach.

jeff moore

2:21 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

how many times does it have to be said before you morons understand.the money used for the stadium and the bus garage could not be used for day to day operations.the stadium is now used for state playoff games that bring in extra money.the school additions came in under budget and the exces money was used to update the west entrance to the school which needed to be done since the 80's.the timing of the stadium and bus garage had to do with extra funding from the government that they would not recieve if they waited.did any of you notice the 20 buses parked outside the old bus garage that was designed to hold six buses.do you seriously think being able to park these buses in a garage wont extend the life of the buses?thus saving the district money on repairs and new buses.the district came in under budget on the expansion of the schools,when is the last time you heard of a school district doing that?I think they are doing a responsible job with there finances. the state is cutting there funding and the power plant is closing.that is the reason for the levy. not because they were irresponsible with the schools money.the attacks on the superintendant and teachers salaries are rediculous.my sons school does a stellar job.i hope your ignorance doesnt change that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jamie K

2:47 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Wow! That will get us to vote for a levy. Maybe you should stop talking Jeff. At this pace I'm going to have to be at every meeting to calm you guys down. Save money while economic times are tough. Wait for your opportunity. Be understanding of our neighbors. Do not offend us (tax payers).

George Z

3:00 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Hey Jeff -

When the district passes a levy for a garage - where does that come from? An operating levy? Answer: Both come from the taxpayer's pocket. I like the stadium & garage -- I just think the timing of both (asking for more) was horrible & irresponsible when, at the time, state budget cuts were expected.

You're logic on the added bus longevity has been disputed by many. I do know that no one on the westside has a "monster garage". Any reason? Maybe you could consult them on this. Because the Fed's coughed up some money, doesn't mean we could afford our part.

If they are so responsible and stellar -- why are we 50% higher (per pupil) than Avon? I'd really like to know. Both are "excellent" rated.

So before you give me a lecture on "monies come from a different pot" and call me a moron because of it -- get your act together. My part of it comes from my wallet regardless of capital or operating. Congratulations, you've honked me off so $@#* much I might learn to like voting against the schools. I personally like to keep the money I've earned and resent the folks who believe that this levy failure is a "shameful" act.

Another answer I'd really like from someone -- when is enough? When do tax rates make our city an unattractive place to buy into? I don't want us to turn into Bay Village. Cost of living (compared to Westlake, Avon, RR) use to be an advantage we had. No longer. When is enough?

Reply

jeff moore

3:16 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jamie k ,
you are right,I should quit posting I need to spend my time collecting all the money off my money tree so when the schools fail and my property values go down and our town that already cant support any business gets worse. i will be able to support my family.When that happens you will be ok because all the dead beats that move into your neighborhood wont take care of there house either so nobody will notice your garage door.maybe now you can put that money towards your stove.

Reply

Jamie K

3:19 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Nevermind, you're making me laugh now. Keep going.

Reply

jeff moore

3:30 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

George,
The figure is 30 % not 50%.Also have you noticed how many levy campaigns there have been in Avon in recent years.maybe they are having money issues because of the lower price per student.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave D

11:22 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jeff, the correct amount is 51.8%. That's how much more Avon Lake Spends than Avon per student. Let's see, if we multiply the difference by the number of students in Avon lake, I bet we would have the money we need. It seems that no one can explain why we need that much more money. I drop my grandsons off at school on Tuesday and Thursday at 8:30. I see at 3-4 teachers flying into the parking lot going into the school to start work. At 3:25 I see a good many of them leaving......
Just my observation.

George Z

3:31 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jeff -

You didn't answer my question. You can call me a moron, but you can't answer a simple question?

One levy doesn't mean the end of our town. It means it was the wrong solution. Trust me, they'll come back for more money and we can argue then. Maybe we could run for the school board? I'm out.

Reply

Becky R

7:50 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Is there a long term plan in place? The emergency levy would cover the next 5 years, right? What happens then? How do we recover from the loss of state funding and the power plant? Those things aren't going to magically come back in 5 years. The levy would be a temporary fix. In order to support a levy of this magnitude, I want to know what we plan on doing to help avoid this situation in the future. Our children are important, are teachers and programs are important. I am not against higher taxes or a levy to support the schools, but I want to see a long term plan.

Reply

jeff moore

8:41 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

George,
The answer to the question "when do tax rates become too high and make our city unattractive" is when your school system becomes average because of its residents lack of forethought.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

7:25 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Our schools are anything but average. The admin spending 50% more than comparable counterparts makes us a less attractive area to move into. One levy won't change this.

Frankly, the community has spoken loud & clear (twice) -- be better managers with OUR money before you get any more. Everyone cries foul about the state cuts, but they were telegraphed well ahead of time (the Board ignored them). I think Scott will not get re-elected when his term is up (if he even runs). Anyone know when his term comes up?

Get Real

9:18 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Is it the resident's lack of forethought or the superintendent's and school board's lack of forethought for not recognizing in a recession that funding cuts were coming from the state and it was irresponsible to spend wastefully on buildings. Yes, those may be different funds of money to the schools, but it all comes out of my one and only pay check. Incompetence by the superintendent and board must be addressed. It is a shame that the great teachers and staff of the district will likely pay the price of a poor administration at the district level who failed to plan and have forethought to see a budget crisis coming. Until I see 20% voluntary pay cuts from all the administrators in this district and them showing a willingness to share in the pain for their bad decisions I will not be voting for another levy of this magnitude. They need to own up to their part in this mess and be willing to feel some pain too. That is true leadership. When you have a community of tax payers that are taking pay cuts at their jobs and getting miniscule raises if you're lucky I fail to see how they think that their electorate can afford this massive increase.

Reply

Steve83

10:06 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jeff
Actually, it is 52% not 30%
(10904-7181)=3723
3723/7181=52%
Avon Lake spends 52% more per student than Avon
Also, a lot of Avon's levies have been bond issues for new buildings not operating levies. This last one took 3 tries to pass to build a new middle school. Avon Lake has been significantly outspending Avon for 10 years so it its not a shortage of money that they spend less.
Again, I don't mind paying for good teachers and schools, just tell me what we are getting for the extra 50%

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve83

9:42 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Here is the spending per year per student (total) per Ohio Department of Education.
Note that it can be broken down into categories of instructional, administration, building support, pupil support, and staff support (see Ohio DOE website for details). Avon Lake outspends Avon in all categories except staff support (training, etc.) which is Avon Lake $36 vs. Avon $287 (per student):
Year Avon Avon Lake
1995 5,363 5,556
1996 5,174 6,037
1997 5,455 5,763
1998 5,403 6,659
1999 5,449 6,746
2000 6,393 8,266
2001 6,582 7,735
2002 7,094 8,299
2003 6,501 8,406
2004 7,366 9,397
2005 7,264 9,799
2006 7,465 9,571
2007 7,702 9,686
2008 7,974 10,047
2009 8,001 10,334
2010 7,707 10,564
2011 7,181 10,904

Comment_arrow

George Z

10:44 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Great info. Any chance of posting the link -- I'd like for myself?

Dave

7:55 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

in Jeff's world 52% = 30%... for the sake of his argument.
Here's a question for all, if the levy was for .... say 4.8 ml, would that have changed your vote?
What do you think the asking price will be come the next vote?

Reply

George Z

8:16 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

In my mind it would go from "heck no" to "possibly". I would want more advance notice of the info meeting (I found out day of and could not go) I'm generally distrustful of the admin's #'s. (ie "if you can't dazzle me with brilliance, then baffle me with bs").

The fact the teachers did not get a raise when many in the community being asked for money isn't much of a "give back". I don't consider a raise a god given guarantee.

I would be open to a increase when I know of the cuts MADE to make us more in line with other cities.

Reply

Ashley Riddle

10:50 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

All I have to say is that I'm really upset that the levy failed. My favorite teacher is at risk of being cut and it is completely unfair. I don't even know what to say about it. I just hope that everyone who voted against the levy, knew exactly what they were voting against and had a good reason for doing it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Z

12:23 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

That would be very unfortunate and I hope they find better solutions than "slash & burn" (maybe more self pay for healthcare or retirements for example).

Remember the cause here -- the EPA putting strong regulations shutting down the power plant. 7 in OH are being shut down. Can anything be done to reverse this (I assume the city has explored that and no). But we do have the advantage of a cleaner environment. It's a no win in either case.

Dave D

11:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Just more fuel for the fire. Avon Lake spends 13 million more per year than Avon.
Maybe we should be looking to Avon for answers? Their school system is ranked as high or higher.

Here is the link from the state of Ohio.
http://stateimpact.npr.org/ohio/2012/01/17/see-how-much-each-ohio-school-district-spends-per-student/

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve83

12:40 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Interesting link - note that Avon is the lowest district in Ohio for total spending per student and Avon Lake is 133rd highest (out of 614 districts). If you look at instructional spending per student - Avon is 16th lowest in the state while Avon Lake is 135th highest.

Terska

1:20 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

My guess is that Avon has lower costs because they are rapidly expanding and have newer teacher hires with lower salaries. Their costs will escalate as their teachers gain seniority. Avon just passed a levy to build a new middle school.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve83

2:44 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Terska - If you look a the data - the difference is cost goes back 11 years - longer than the current boom. Avon Lake also had expansion in the last decade with all of the new subdivisions/homes including re-opening Troy and expanding the other school buildings and high school. It would be interesting to see the difference in teacher demographics (years experience) between the two.

Laurie

2:38 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I think I should become a teacher or administrator - I make half of what teachers do yet I am expected to foot a bigger tax bill. Who in the h*ll do you think will pay for another vote in May? We the taxpayers. STOP THIS NONSENSE, AVON LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT!!!

Reply

Leave a comment