patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Candidates Night: School Board Members Provide Stances on Issue 2

Candidates queried on their stance on Issue 2, repealing SB5

 

The seven Avon Lake School Board candidates were asked where they stand on Issue 2, the repealing of SB5, at the Avon Lake Candidates’ Night on Oct. 27. Some candidates spoke outright against Issue 2, while some said the district already has controls in place. Note: With the exception of Ron Jantz, who had one minute to respond, the remaining candidates had 30 seconds to respond. 

Visit our Election Central page for full bios of each candidate

Ron Jantz said the school board has a “great relationship” with the teachers’ union. “Teacher performance is covered (in the recently negotiated contract). We have is covered with or without SB5.

Mike Hellyar said Issue 2 “addresses what needs to be addressed but it wasn’t done in the right way.” He feels the issues in the bill need to be addressed one piece at a time.

Thomasina Houston said the school board was not a legislative body and she will enforce whatever law is passed.

Thomas Smith said the bill had good and bad aspects and teachers are already contributing to health care. He noted that the bill prevents the teachers from striking and he believed the teachers have a right to strike.

Jim Stobe said he supports repealing the bill because it’s too far reaching.

Pam Ohradzansky said the bill was very polarizing. She said she supports some of the bill’s aspects but dislikes others. “Whatever the outcome, well deal with it in Avon Lake.”

John Crooks said SB5 needs to be removed because it “doesn’t carry the idea of investing in people.”

Related Topics: Avon Lake Board of Education, Election 2011, issue 2, and sb5

Dave D

9:55 am on Monday, October 31, 2011

It looks like Thomasina and Pam both have the right answers and don't want to include politics into the school board. They will get my vote.

Reply

Jennifer

10:20 am on Monday, October 31, 2011

I attended the candidates night and I dont believe this article captures the complete sentiments of the candidates. When this question was asked, I sensed most of the candidates were trying to avoid taking a stance. Of the group, Jim Stobe was the most direct in his answer. Whether you agree with him or not, he gave the most direct answer of the group. We need to be confident that we elect people for the Board who can clearly articulate their opinions on difficult topics.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Lori E. Switaj

10:30 am on Monday, October 31, 2011

Jennifer, fair comments. One of the biggest problems I have always had with Candidates' Night is the time allowed for the answers. I don't think it's possible for a candidate to completely convey their rationale for supporting or not supporting an issue in 30 seconds. At noon, we are launching our voting guide and hopefully the candidates will have taken the opportunity to have addressed one of the questions we posed: "Do you support repealing SB5?"

Reply

Leave a comment