Middle School Bond Issue Going on March Ballot
Some at meeting angry over no public comment before vote
The $32 million bond issue to build a new Avon Middle School will be on the March primary ballot after the Board of Education approved it at a special meeting Wednesday at Heritage North.
The bond issue was defeated by less than 200 votes -- 3,903 to 3,726 -- in the Nov. 8 election. Ohio's primary election is March 6, 2012. In order to be on that ballot, the bond issue must be filed with the Lorain County Board of Elections by Dec. 7.
The bond issue would cost homeowners an additional $38.29 per year for every $100,000 in home valuation.
Some residents who came to the meeting were angry that there was no opportunity for public comment or discussion before the vote.
Former superintendent Bob Barnhardt said after the vote and before the board went into executive session that treasurer Kent Zeman had "misled" him in an earlier phone conversation about the chance to speak at the meeting.
"I had a presentation ready hoping to influence the decision," he said to Zeman. "You knew I was here for this purpose."
Zeman said that there is no requirement to have public discussion at a special meeting.
Resident Tony Manning expressed frustration after leaving the meeting.
"They're asking for $32 million over 32 years," he said. "But they're making decisions for us and we didn't get a voice here. If we need to build a school, fine, give us the information."
Manning said he felt the case had not been made for building a new school instead of renovating existing buildings.
"We don't need Taj Mahals," he said.
Two renewal levies were combined into one to also be put up for a vote in March. One is set to expire in 2012, one in 2013. Zeman said the two together will be for $2.5 million at 3.21 mills, with no cost increase. The levy would be for 10 years.
"This will help alleviate some voter fatigue," Zeman said. If this renewal passes, he said, no renewal levies are expected to be on the ballot in 2013.
Glen Heitkamp
8:09 am on Thursday, December 1, 2011
I agree completely with the School Board; Tony Manning says "We don't need Taj Mahals" and "If we need to build a school, fine, give us the information". In my opinion, the School Board has demonstrated and provided information for the need for a new middle school. Also, the money that the school board is requesting, the new middle school will not be a Taj Mahal but a building that will educate students who eventually will create jobs and pay taxes to fund the baby boom generation's retirement & medical expenses!
Jeff
2:56 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Is this going to be a second middle school, or will it replace the existing one?
Melissa Hebert
3:36 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
This will be a new middle school to replace the current one. One possibility discussed before the November election is that, if a new middle school is built, the existing middle school would be used for the kindergartners instead of Village School. That has not been finalized.
Glen Heitkamp
7:28 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Melissa, in your article on Nov. 9, 2011 you wrote: "The new middle school, supporters added, could also help alleviate crowding at Heritage North and Heritage South elementary schools by possibly moving the sixth-graders there to the new middle school. Village School, the oldest school in the district, could be closed and the students moved to the single-level current middle school."
Jeff should know that without a new middle school, both Heritage N & S would have to be expanded and renovation at the Village School may have to place and expect to see trailers outside the Middle School in the near future. As far as renovating the existing middle school, the cost would be almost as much as a new school. Renovation includes HVAC, technological and building envelope upgrades AND the possibility of Abestos and Lead paint mitigation will not come cheap.
Nick
11:00 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
There is a $12,000,000.00 difference between renovating what we have and building a new school. How is that "almost as much"? Where I come from, that is still an extremely large amount of money. Then, should they get what they want, what's next, higher taxes to run the new schools? Quit lying to the people and tell us why they really want to take more of our paychecks from us!
Glen Heitkamp
11:30 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011
Nick, you are right $12m is a lot but a new school provides more flexibility for the school district and would reduce long term operating costs compared to the alternative; as far as more money being taken out of your paycheck, to be the best cost money but the kids are our future; I would concentrate your effort in pressuring politicians in reigning in entitlements like medicare and social security. I am 45, at the rate we are going, I do not expect to see any SS or medicare unless we can expand our tax base by educating our kids to become more competitive and bring manfacturing back to the US.