patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Santorum's Popularity Growing in Ohio

Latest Quinnipiac poll shows candidate is favored to win March 6 primary, but cautions up to half of GOP voters might change their minds.

 

A poll released Wednesday shows presidential candidate Rick Santorum springing to the most-favored spot among Ohio Republican primary voters.

The Quinnipiac University poll shows the former Pennsylvanian senator, who will appear Saturday at a fundraiser in Summit County, with 36 percent of voters.

The poll, cautions, however that 50 percent of the Republicans polled said they might change their minds in the coming days.

Santorum is slated to appear Saturday at the Summit County Republican Party's annual Lincoln Day dinner at a hotel in Akron. The event is sold out.

Santorum also is to appear March 2 at a Lake County Republican Party Lincoln Day dinner at the American Croatian Lodge in Eastlake.

Other coverage of the poll appeared on cbsnews.comcleveland.com, and  dispatch.com.

Related Topics: PRIMARY 2012 and elections 2012
Who do you favor as the GOP nominee? Tell us in the comments.

*

11:04 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands? ~Ernest Gaines

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

11:07 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Who would give a law to lovers? Love is unto itself a higher law. ~Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, A.D. 524

Comment_arrow

*

3:35 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

“[Gay marriage] threatens my marriage. It threatens all marriages. It threatens the traditional values of this country.”

- Santorum speaking to The New York Times Magazine, May 2005

*

11:08 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

No government has the right to tell its citizens when or whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody. ~Rita Mae Brown, speech, 28 August 1982

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

11:08 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

You could move. ~Abigail Van Buren, "Dear Abby," in response to a reader who complained that a gay couple was moving in across the street and wanted to know what he could do to improve the quality of the neighborhood

Comment_arrow

*

11:09 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

War. Rape. Murder. Poverty. Equal rights for gays. Guess which one the Southern Baptist Convention is protesting? ~The Value of Families

Comment_arrow

*

11:18 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Straight Americans need... an education of the heart and soul. They must understand - to begin with - how it can feel to spend years denying your own deepest truths, to sit silently through classes, meals, and church services while people you love toss off remarks that brutalize your soul. ~Bruce Bawer, The Advocate, 28 April 1998

*

11:12 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I'm a supporter of gay rights. And not a closet supporter either. From the time I was a kid, I have never been able to understand attacks upon the gay community. There are so many qualities that make up a human being... by the time I get through with all the things that I really admire about people, what they do with their private parts is probably so low on the list that it is irrelevant. ~Paul Newman

Reply

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

11:22 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Great quotes Karyn. Many people get annoyed with it on patch. If they get annoyed you must be getting through ;0)

Reply

Jack Kelly

12:36 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

These quote have absolutely NO relevance to this story in the least.
In the internet world, you're considered "trolling."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Debbie S.

1:55 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I agree, Jack. Comments should stick to the topic of the article at hand. There is absolutely a place for discussion of gay rights, but this article isn't that place, Karyn, unless you are tying it into Santorum's popularity in Ohio. And Hilary - Patch requires you to use your first and last name. Please follow the rules to which the rest of us are adhering!

Comment_arrow

*

3:32 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

“Is anyone saying same-sex couples can’t love each other? I love my children. I love my friends, my brother. Heck, I even love my mother-in-law. Should we call these relationships marriage, too?”

- Santorum, Writing in the Philadelphia Inquirer, May 2008

Comment_arrow

*

3:33 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

“You can say I’m a hater. But I would argue I’m a lover. I’m a lover of traditional families and of the right of children to have a mother and father… I would argue that the future of America hangs in the balance, because the future of the family hangs in the balance. Isn’t that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?”

- Santorum, Quoted in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, July 2004

Comment_arrow

Jack Kelly

5:20 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

"Pac",

12 year-olds belong in a chatroom. I suggest you take your immature antics there. If you can't be a MATURE ADULT and use your REAL NAME (per TOS), then go away.

Just citing ridiculous quotes from a variety of sources and not discussing them AND how they are relevant makes them irrelevant.

Comment_arrow

MOST HATED PERSON ON PATCH

5:22 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

why are you all such suckers for TOS and "rules" y'all crack me up. tell me, raise your hands if you read the EULA of the last piece of software you stole....

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

12:58 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

See, see Karyn? Case in point! LOL....let's splatter the world with meaningful quotes that require others to think outside the box rather than to obliterate each other <3

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

3:30 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I couldn't agree more!

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

1:05 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I tHink I too will contribute a quote. This in response to Santorum, the republicans at large, democrats and all American political parties, and the government:

"If I have one message to give to the secular American people, it’s that the world is not divided into countries. The world is not divided between East and West. You are American, I am Iranian, we don’t know each other, but we talk together and we understand each other perfectly. The difference between you and your government is much bigger than the difference between you and me. And the difference between me and my government is much bigger than the difference between me and you. And our governments are very much the same." quoted from Marjane Satrapi, Iranian graphic novelist "Persepolis"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Bodi

11:55 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Anyone who argues that the world is not divided into countries is not living in the real world.

And anyone who thinks that the East and West understand each other perfectly, in particular Judeo-Christian vs. Islamicism, is beyond hope. The differences are not governmental, they are philosophical, and to the core of what makes the West different than the Muslin world.

Le'ah, you say that you are a atheist Jew, but you don't know the history of your own people.

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

1:11 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

"A poll released Wednesday shows presidential candidate Rick Santorum springing to the most-favored spot among Ohio Republican primary voters." I intuit that Santorum will be doing some "trolling" of his own. Watch out folks.

Reply

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

1:14 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

From the wiki definition of trolling, I believe Rick and other republican candidates do much of this in their campaign ads and debates:
"While the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels subjective, with trolling describing intentionally provocative actions and harassment outside of an online context. For example, mass media has used troll to describe "a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families."[5][6]"

Reply

Jessica Johnson Salamon

2:36 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

A more effective approach would have been to show quotes of Santorum's anti gay sentiment, goodness knows there are enough of them.

I've personally met the man and if he were the only candidate, he still wouldn't get my vote.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Amanda Harnocz

3:04 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Patch requires users to use their real first and last name per our terms of use: http://stow.patch.com/terms. Please update your accounts if they are not in line with the terms. and thank you for participating on Patch, we appreciate everyone's involvement!

Reply
Comment_arrow

MOST HATED PERSON ON PATCH

4:03 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

who cares, and as pac stated it is a SAFETY AND PRIVACY issue with using "real names" get over it...

Comment_arrow

MOST HATED PERSON ON PATCH

5:28 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Jack Helbig you are brilliantly blinded by your own ignorance. i think i just got a tan. privacy has no place online? really? ok, well please post your home address on here and we'll get together and have a little chat about it. or i can murder your family* whichever you prefer.

*murder your family is an example of evil doing MOST HATED PERSON ON PATCH does not condone evil doers.

*

3:21 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

“Marriage is not about affirming somebody’s love for somebody else. It’s about uniting together to be open to children, to further civilization in our society.” –Rick Santorum on Fox News Sunday

Reply

*

3:21 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

"[The] right to privacy…doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution." –Rick Santorum

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

3:26 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

■“I would argue, this right to privacy … doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold — Griswold was the contraceptive case — and abortion. And now we’re just extending it out. And the further you extend it out, the more you — this freedom actually intervenes and affects the family. You say, well, it’s my individual freedom. Yes, but it destroys the basic unit of our society because it condones behavior that’s antithetical to strong healthy families. Whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, where it’s sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family.” (2003)

Comment_arrow

*

3:27 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

■“Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society. And that’s what? Children. Monogamous relationships. In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality.” (2003)

*

3:24 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I guess because you stand for traditional marriage and you believe that, you know, that people should, we should have a society that affirms one man and one woman as marriage, that makes you someone who’s a hater, someone that doesn’t, doesn’t like people. I disagree with people, by the way, who are gay and straight who believe in changing the marriage laws. But it’s a public policy discussion, and this is the, this is really the problem that we see on the left which is the personalization of politics. I mean, we have a policy disagreement, and, and which I am very passionate about. I admit that. Because I do believe the family, integrity of the family is important for the future of our country. But that does not mean that, that I don’t like people or I hate people or that there’s something wrong. The only thing that’s wrong is their opinion.” (2011)

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

3:25 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

"Is anyone saying same-sex couples can’t love each other? I love my children. I love my friends, my brother. Heck, I even love my mother-in-law. Should we call these relationships marriage, too?” (2008)

Comment_arrow

*

3:25 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

■“I’m worried when many people will stand up and say, ‘well whatever the Generals want.’ I’m not too sure that we haven’t indoctrinated the Officer Corps in this country that they can actually see straight to make the right decisions.” (On repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell) (2011)

*

3:26 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

■“ I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts. As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships. And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual. I have nothing, absolutely nothing against anyone who’s homosexual. If that’s their orientation, then I accept that. And I have no problem with someone who has other orientations. The question is, do you act upon those orientations? So it’s not the person, it’s the person’s actions. And you have to separate the person from their actions.” (2003)

Reply

*

3:27 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

■“In this case, what we’re talking about, basically, is priests who were having sexual relations with post-pubescent men. We’re not talking about priests with 3-year-olds, or 5-year-olds. We’re talking about a basic homosexual relationship.” (On the Catholic Church’s international pedophile priests scandal, in which, for decades, priests have sexually assaulted, molested, and raped young boys and girls.) (2003)

Reply

*

3:29 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Rick Santorum continued his string of antigay pronouncements while on the trail in New Hampshire, saying a man in jail would be a better parent than a same-sex couple.
Santorum claimed to quote an anti-poverty expert while explaining his case.

"He found that even fathers in jail who had abandoned their kids were still better than no father at all to have in their children's lives," Santorum told voters about the researcher, according to the Times.

If a same-sex couple were to raise a child, they would be "robbing children of something they need, they deserve, they have a right to. You may rationalize that that isn't true, but in your own life and in your own heart, you know it's true."

This isn't a new theme for Santorum and it potentially sets him apart from other Republican candidates for president. While in Iowa, Santorum signed a pledge from the Iowa Family Leader that proclaimed his belief that same-sex parents are inferior to straight ones. Romney and Ron Paul did not sign the pledge, and Newt Gingrich inexplicably ignored that portion in his letter to the group backing only parts of it. (Gingrich's lesbian step-sister, Candace Gingrich-Jones, told The Advocate in December that she and her wife would like to have children.)

Reply

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

4:17 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

b, pac, and Karyn--- I see the same things you see going on, and it stinks that we have to be so careful with our identities so as to protect our safety when we are communicating with one another about things we are all equally concerned about. can I we be friends on facebook? I use Grey Sparrow Press as my facebook name. I find what you have to say very valuable, and honestly, it helps me not feel so isolated an alone, in this most trying time in my life. Thank you three for your honesty and courage.

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

5:41 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Ah, Facebook! :) I believe I am officially the only person I know who doesn't have a Facebook account. I used to, but became concerned about privacy issues over a year ago. I spent a good couple of weeks attempting to delete my account only to have them inform me that even though I finally successfully "deleted" my account, turns out I'm still in the system somewhere (they don't know where though) and every thing I ever typed, uploaded, etc. is still there and will always be there and will be sold. Argh... I've considered jumping back on the facebook wagon just because a lot of businesses use Facebook as their sole page darn it!
I may have to (and I will let you know if I do!!) because it is really nice to know there are others out there who feel the same way. And it's always fantastic to find a fellow lover of good quotes!
"Most collectors collect tangibles. As a quotation collector, I collect wisdom, life, invisible beauty, souls alive in ink." ~Terri Guillemets

Comment_arrow

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

7:02 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I understand Karyn. I deleted my facebook account for a looping while up until two months ago. I deleted it because of some nastiness going around and harmful people locating me ( scary individuals from my past). Is there a way I can privately send you my email on here??

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

4:20 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Grey sparrow isn't my personal page....(lol.... Yeah i know I'm cautious with my usual account. But I know you guys understand ;0) it is my press name's page ( I do chapbooks) but you can send a personal message there and I will see it. We can talk this way. I really do want a sense of community, I do. Our family really needs friends :0)

Reply

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

4:28 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

You know. I think I will use my real name--- my Hebrew name ( some American Yidden have English names along side their Hebrew/birth names) mine is Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski ( Krzywkowski is my maiden name) . I am trying to change it to that on here. But there is no way I can on patch. Does someone know how I correct my name?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Debbie S.

4:40 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Hilary - log in and go to PROFILE (under your name in the upper right corner). Once in your profile, click EDIT PROFILE (middle left column) and change your user name to include first and last name, then save the changes. Pretty simple.

MOST HATED PERSON ON PATCH

4:52 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

you are misinformed. with the amount of data you have online i can find out anything about you and your family, as well as mess with your financials. think i'm wrong? you have no idea....and for the record, i'm not threatening you, i'm informing you. you seem to need the education.

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

5:24 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

It is insanely creepy what info one can glean from a simple internet search. No one is safe. Gives me the heebee-geebees just thinking about it. Type in anyone's name and find out where they live, their ages, income levels, prior convitions (if any) and the list goes on. Privacy. In the technological age, privacy doesn't exist.

MOST HATED PERSON ON PATCH

4:57 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

oh and it's under "account" not "profile" more up to date accurate information from patch... lulzzzzzz

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Susan Ruiz Patton

6:23 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

A user is going to be suspended for violating our terms of use. Personal attacks are not permitted.

Reply

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

6:39 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Ok. People know me as Hilary, but the terms of use are that I put my 'real' name. So here I am. :0) it was hard for me to figure out but Debbie was a big help. Thank you

Reply

Callie E.

10:24 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I am glad that there is actually a candidate out there that projects the same moral convictions and values that I have. While I am not going to spew forth hundreds of quotations from other people, I will say this: Not everyone feels the way that Karyn, Le'ah, and several others do. Everyone that doesn't agree with them are, shockingly, NOT idiots. Everyone IS still entitled to their own opinion in this country, whether you like it or not. I am so sick and tired of this "reverse bigotry" that I could completely throw up. You talk and talk about how "conservatives" are so CLOSE-MINDED. Take a look at yourselves. I am not trying to force you to believe my way is right. I am not calling you names and insinuating that you are a complete idiot. Yet I am the one who is supposedly "close-minded?" Please.

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

11:42 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

I'm not sure if you are aware but Mr. Santorum is emphatically against all forms of birth control and firmly believes the the only reason humans are to have intercourse is to have make a baby. All forms of birth control are off the table, even condoms.

Comment_arrow

*

11:42 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

A little info on condoms and why they save lives verses taking them:
For preventing the spread of HIV and other STDs and in reducing unwanted pregnancy, condoms are very effective.
When used properly and consistently, condoms are 98 percent effective in preventing pregnancy. This means that in one year's time, two couples out of 100 who use condoms will have an unintended pregnancy.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that condoms have been shown to be effective in the preventing HIV infection. In a two-year study of couples in which one partner was HIV-positive and the other HIV-negative, no HIV-negative partner was infected when condoms were used correctly and consistently. Among couples in which condom use was inconsistent, 10 percent of the HIV-negative partners became infected.
Massachusetts, where condoms are distributed to students in some high schools, had a teen pregnancy rate in 2004 of 22 per 1,000 teenage girls, far below recent national averages of more than 80 pregnancies per 1,000. The state had only 11 HIV diagnoses among teens in 2004.
The CDC also reports condoms are effective in preventing some STDs and in reducing the risk of HPV, the virus associated with cervical cancer.

Comment_arrow

*

11:43 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

But despite the data on condom effectiveness and programs to educate teens about HIV, condom use among sexually active teens is often not a priority. The Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that 56 percent of teens, both makes and females, agreed with the statement, "Having sex without a condom every now and then is not that big of a deal."
But it may, in fact, be a big deal, because the rate of STD infection is on the rise, and 25 percent of people diagnosed with new infections are teenagers.
When parents frankly discuss the use of condoms with teens, teenagers are three times more likely to use condoms and less likely to be infected by STDs or involved with an unintended pregnancy.
Timing of these parental discussions is critical. Condom use was found to increase only when parents talk to their teen about condoms before the teen's first sexual encounter. A discussion after a teen's first sexual intercourse was found to have no effect on the rate of condom use.

Comment_arrow

Tim Torrence

2:26 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Pay no attention to the empty can Callie. As the candidate has repeatedly stated he is not against birth control. He is against federal legislation on birth control usage. He has even called state legislation on the matter "stupid". He has stated his personal opinion of birth control but has firmly stated that he would not relieve you of that option if you so choose to exercise it. The only way to win such a debate for people so far to the left of mainstream society is to change the nature of the debate, and the actual title of the debate for that matter. They play on fear without remorse.

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

10:37 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

" I will say this: Not everyone feels the way that Karyn, Le'ah, and several others do. Everyone that doesn't agree with them are, shockingly, NOT idiots. Everyone IS still entitled to their own opinion in this country, whether you like it or not. I am so sick and tired of this "reverse bigotry" that I could completely throw up" I do get nauseated at the use of reverse bigotry too. I do not like mind games of any sort ( I have had to deal with lots of that in my life time so far) I like that we have the freedom to share our opinions. You are not a bad person because you find Santorum a worthy candidate. It's okay for us not to like him as well. I did not say you had a close mind. If I made you feel bad about yourself I am genuinely sorry. I know what it feels like to be cast into a role that just isn't mine. I will stop commenting on here for the sake of everyones sanity.

Reply

Jon Parski

12:01 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

The reason this country is in the shape it's in is because we keep falling into these "moral issue" traps. These issues are important, but IMO this is all smoke and mirrors, a "wag the dog" scenario that is distracting voters from the topics that need to be dealt with immeadiatly. People are losing jobs, having trouble making ends meet, but now we're bickering about gay marriage and birth control. Tune out the talking heads and there propaganda. God gave you a brain; use it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

*

3:13 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Ah yes, the fine art of misdirection.

demo rat

12:22 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Truly, I'm amazed that birth control is even an issue in 2012.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

12:33 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Yeah me too. I'm trying to learn "wise woman" medicine. My grandmothers knew which herbs and plants to eat and which parts to act as a birth control. Certain herbs cause the vagina to be more acidic, thus killing the sperm and creating an unfavorable environment for fertilization. In my tradition the women have passed down these secrets. And I am happy the surrounding culture doesn't know aout them. It may be illegal for a woman to take black cohosh, or to chew on a root...( I am laughing and shedding a sad tear about this at once) every day I am thankful for the knowledge from my ancestors. It helps me stay a float in this society.

Comment_arrow

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

1:08 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

I often wondered in what ways regions of the US are ethnically cleansed. I know this is a side topic, but I believe that Mr Gingrich reflects the values of ethnic cleansing. his comment about Hispanics and Latinos in America speaking Spanish spoke very strong to me about how he views cultures other than his own. When something is ethnically cleansed, it means the destroying of ones roots. Not only forced assimilation, but the taking away of that person/group/communities identity. Its almost as though there is this hidden pre-requisite to being an 'American’ technically the Iroquois from the Sioux to the Navaho, to the Apache and ll the indigenous peoples, were the first Americans. Yet their culture and way of life has been strangled out.

Comment_arrow

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

1:13 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Part two ( part one below)

My great grandfather's father was a Shaman. His English wife burned all of his medicines and his masks. I only know about the secrets to healing  because of my grandmothers. I am also a Yid. I have traditions from my mothers grandmothers....I have a connection to my blood and my roots. People who still have their roots are scary and intimidating to the assimilated ranks. And of course, I am talking about something that probably a select few who read this will understand what I mean. Others will take offense. One thing that we can agree on, all of us, is that there is great diversity in America, some of it suppressed beneath certain laws,  some not.  If you are of a culture/gender/faith that has had to live in the closet, then you may perfectly understand what I am talking about.

Comment_arrow

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

1:13 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Technicality: my great grandfather learned the secrets from his father who was a Shaman, but then when he was assimilated and married an English woman, it all changed. his possessions were burned after his death. From this my mother and I could gather that it was an ethnic cleansing of sorts, and then from that point on our traditions absorbed into the local culture. So I've seen this at work on a personal level.

Comment_arrow

*

3:12 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Me too. Then again, it's been nearly a century and America hans't even ratified the ERA (Equal Rights Amendment which was first proposed in 1923).

Comment_arrow

James Thomas

2:19 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

LKSK,
"technically the Iroquois from the Sioux to the Navaho, to the Apache and ll the indigenous peoples, were the first Americans. " No. Technically, they were the first populace of the region now known as North America (I'm sure they had their own name for it). The first Americans were the signers of the Declaration of Independence and the constituancies they represented.

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

12:24 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

I think it also has to do with the level at which people are informed about real life issues that will effect them, and the legislative process behind that. So of course, depending on what the politician 'stands for', you will have citizens who are concerned ( it is the fate of our lives up for debate). In my homeland we have a Knessett, a prime minister and multiple parties. Regular citizens can form parties. It is democratic and it is not without faults. I've been following two elections this year: American and Israeli. I know as an Israeli I notice that republicans use the Israel debate to also push their agendas. I am one of many Israelis who do not buy into it. It is mostly the orthodox and conservative Jews that like republicans. Not necessarily their values about everything else. But that of the state of Israel. I don't care what Mitt, Rick or Newt think about the state of Israel. I care about justice and freedom from oppression. A politician who would work to prevent the giving of birth control to women is and news to me. I am a woman. I have a daughter, a mother a sister. Of course I will vote against someone who will take away my reproductive choices. That is logical. Using my brain.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski

12:27 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Darn typos! Arg! I meant to type * a politician who would prevent womens access to birth control is not someone I would vote for"

Callie E.

3:17 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Educate yourselves. Don't go bashing the guy for being ANTI-CONDOM when you don't know what you're talking about. Clearly he is not going to push that idea on others. Unlike some OTHER politicians, who are trying to force their OPINIONS down the throats of their constituents.

"Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum said on Wednesday that, despite his personal opposition to contraception, he wouldn't work to limit its accessibility if elected president."

"How do I feel about the issue of contraception? It should be available,” Santorum said during an interview with CNN’s Piers Morgan. "I object to [it] when the federal government says that religious organizations who feel the way the Catholic Church feels should be required to provide it. I think that's an infringement upon their religious liberties."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/16/rick-santorum-contraception_n_1282339.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

demo rat

5:44 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

You're right, Callie - it's the Democrats who are moralizing me to death - and they're such hypocrites, too! That's why I support Newt! But really, since Catholics are not out there using physical methods of birth control, religious organizations will not be put in the position of providing health coverage for this and therefore, this should be a non-issue, right? I'm sure Newt knows this - he's Catholic.

Comment_arrow

*

9:22 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

"One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country.... Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that's okay, contraception is okay. It's not okay. It's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be." --Rick Santorum

Comment_arrow

*

9:24 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Santorum has said he wouldn’t try to take away the birth control pill or condoms but that states should be free to ban them. He told a Christian blog last year that as president he would warn the nation about “the dangers of contraception” and the permissive culture it encourages.

Comment_arrow

*

9:27 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

You must not have read all of the article:
As a Pennsylvania senator, Santorum did vote to support Title X, a federal program that funds family planning and related preventive health services, but his website now includes a number of executive actions he would take to pare back the program. In October, he also spoke on the "dangers of contraception in this country," and in the past has also called it "harmful to women."
Santorum has instead explained that he believes states should have the right to ban things such as birth control and sodomy without the Supreme Court interfering, though he's said he doesn't personally agree with past attempts to do so.

Comment_arrow

Callie E.

11:22 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

B - and I feel strange addressing a comment to a letter - what exactly makes Santorum a bigot in your opinion? What is your definition of "bigot?" Just wondering.

*

9:31 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

"As I said before, I believe that the better alternative is for abstinence education – for federal funds to be used for that, not for birth control but I voted for it." - Santorum

Ah, maybe he can get Bristol Palin to speak about how abstinence works! It worked for her!

Reply

Callie E.

11:20 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

The problem here is a moral one, and it stems from the very foundations of our country. We have fallen so far in the name of "progress" and many people think that the further we go "progressively," the better off we are. Honestly, have you looked at the news lately? Have you seen the condition of our teens, our children, our schools, the sickening accounts of molestation and murder and hate and twisted minds? Do you not see what is happening? We are going down a road that we can't go back up. We cannot unturn the page. Rick Santorum seems to me to be a candidate who would like to restore some decency to a country that is going to hell in a handbasket. I don't even believe in hell, but if there is one, we are on the fast track. GOOD for him for wanting to teach girls to respect themselves. What is wrong with that? What, exactly, is WRONG with wanting to teach our children that they shouldn't SLEEP AROUND? Bravo to him for that.

And Karyn, some contraception IS harmful to women. If he wants to educate people on those dangers, good for him. I'm against certain contraceptives because they are abortifacient. I had an IUD for two years and my doctor never told me that I could conceive and unknowingly abort a baby! I was LIVID when I found that out, but not ONE person educated me about that beforehand. Had I known, (and I did research it before I had it placed) I never would've done it. So the more education we have on the subject the better. We can't just educate on ONE SIDE.

Reply

Nicole Davis

11:47 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Callie the Dr didn't give you the insert with the IUD that explains how it works? You didn't do the research BEFORE inserting something into YOUR body? You have to be your own best advocate, not rely on others to tell you unfortunately.

We aren't just educating one side. Research has shown that abstinence only education does not work. Absolutely teach that abstinence is BEST, who is arguing against that? However, abstinence only just doesn't work.

Pro-fetus women should not use IUD's, birth control pills or do IVF treatments, if they do they are hypocritical.

Reply

Callie E.

12:01 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

That's exactly what I'm saying. I was young and ignorant and when I asked if an IUD would harm a pregnancy, I was told no. Later I learned that IUDs don't stop conception, but create a hostile environment that prevents implantation.

But a lot of women don't KNOW that "Pro-fetus women should not use IUD's, birth control pills or do IVF treatments." So what's wrong with teaching people about the dangers of contraception? Parents need to step it up and teach their kids to respect themselves and respect their bodies, and then we wouldn't have 3500 unnecessary abortions in this country every day.

Reply
Comment_arrow

demo rat

9:13 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

We should teach our kids to respect themselves, their bodies and each other, I agree. But if our objective is to reduce the number of abortions performed "every day", we should also teach our children about contraception. Despite what Mr. Santorum and the Catholic church desire, people , both married and unmarried, have sex for reasons other than procreation - that will never change.

Comment_arrow

*

10:15 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Miscarriage is the most common type of pregnancy loss, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Studies reveal that anywhere from 10-25% of all clinically recognized pregnancies will end in miscarriage. Chemical pregnancies may account for 50-75% of all miscarriages. This occurs when a pregnancy is lost shortly after implantation, resulting in bleeding that occurs around the time of her expected period. The woman may not realize that she conceived when she experiences a chemical pregnancy.

Maybe when exiting the womb, all girls should receive an "information packet" telling them what their bodies can and can't do so no one can play the ignorance card as they grow into women.

Leave a comment