.

Birth Rates Decline Amid Economic Concerns

U.S. births declined for the fourth consecutive year in 2011, a trend that expert have attributed to the weak economic climate.

4: Successive years of declining births in the U.S.

U.S. births declined for the fourth consecutive year in 2011, a trend that expert have attributed to the weak economic climate. However, last year's decrease was only 1%, not as severe as the 2 or 3% declines of other recent years. This drop in birth rates is relatively new for the U.S., where births had been growing since the late 90s, hitting an all-time high in 2007. There were over 4.3 million births that year, whereas 2011 saw fewer than 4 million. Experts theorize that the declining rates stem from women or couples who are unemployed, underemployed, or otherwise afraid they cannot afford to build a family.

Source: AP, "Baby Bust Continues: US Births Down for 4th Year," 10/3/2012

http://www2.blackrock.com/

Prepared by BlackRock

Delivered courtesy Joel W. Grams, CRPC®, CLTC,

Registered Representative, Financial Planner, 212 Capital Group

38Main Street Suite 360, Westlake Ohio 44145

(440) 835-4501 Ext 17, jgrams@212capitalgroup.com

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 21, 2012 at 02:51 PM
This is a good thing. The world needs less people. There are too many of us. We use and abuse the planet. This is the best news I've heard in a while. The Earth deserves a break from us. We are nothing but a huge invasive species.
James Thomas November 21, 2012 at 03:02 PM
Amanda, I Invite you to do everything you can to alieviate this problem personally.
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 22, 2012 at 03:41 AM
Hey James, thanks for being creepy!
Jeff Mittiga November 22, 2012 at 07:29 PM
If anyone thinks that the US population is not too high ...... they should go shopping tomorrow (day after Thanksgiving). They might change their mind.
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 23, 2012 at 07:04 PM
I get it now, James. I should stop being responsible and pop out tons of babies, get on welfare and food stamps and have people like you take care of me because you want more babies in the world! Can't wait!
James Thomas November 24, 2012 at 08:49 PM
Amanda, You're the one with the humanity sized chip on her shoulder. I think more people means more brains working on a solution.
Debbie S. November 24, 2012 at 11:13 PM
Amanda is right! And as for the "more people means more brains working on a solution" comment: *snort*
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 25, 2012 at 04:03 PM
"What is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or the population explosion? The latter absolutely! To bring about nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the destruction of our most cherished values-there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except what comes naturally - and breed. And how easy it is to do nothing." Isaac Asimov
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 29, 2012 at 03:27 PM
Yes James, I think you're creepy. An angry catholic you are, too.
James Thomas November 29, 2012 at 03:33 PM
OOH Amanda, Anti-Catholic Bigotry?
James Thomas November 29, 2012 at 03:34 PM
Amanda, NO Irish need apply?
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 29, 2012 at 03:49 PM
So more babies means "more brains working on a solution", right? Unfortunately that means ALL brains will ALL sorts of differing opinions and view points. If you want more babies, deal with the fact that most of them won't agree with you.
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 29, 2012 at 03:51 PM
And see, you are an angry catholic. I'm a happy atheist. These statements aren't ripe with bigotry, they're mere truthful observations. Throw all the words you want at me. I'm wrapped in bacon, you know.
James Thomas November 29, 2012 at 03:52 PM
Amanda, since my comment to you was deleted, what are your ideas on censorship.
James Thomas November 29, 2012 at 03:57 PM
Amanda, the leftist mindset: Anyone but Leftists are wrong by definition. Yes that is bigotry.
James Thomas November 29, 2012 at 04:55 PM
Because we're real people with real opinions, not Seinfeld characters. Real people disagree. Seinfeld characters are just disagreeable.
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 29, 2012 at 07:48 PM
Since your comment was deleted, my guess is you dove too deep into the vat.
The Omnipotent Sponge - Soak it up! November 29, 2012 at 08:01 PM
I'm quite impressed at your ability to crawl into my mind. I knew I shouldn't leave my leftist keys just lying about for any Tom, Dick or Harry to find. Well, while you're here, look around, pour a cup of tea and grab a scone and a book. Light up the fireplace. Sit and meditate. My mind is chock full of goodies. Enjoy! Maybe it will even open your mind to the possibility that there is no true line. The so called line is different for everyone. Yes, everyone. And if you've paid attention in life's priceless lessons, your line will have moved thoughout the years, too. You might even find yourself gaining more tolerance or even compassion (gasp!) for those pesky leftist creatures you seem so worried about. I personally see myself as more of an uprightist, as I spend most of my day ambling about with my feet enjoying the Earth. Must be tough to lilt to one side all the time. The left leg muscles of a leftist must have gigundous hamstrings to support such a way of life.
Susan Ruiz Patton November 29, 2012 at 10:25 PM
Hello readers. Please don't beat up on each other. There's no need for that and we don't encourage that on our site. There's nothing wrong with a healthy debate, but there's no need to call each other names and be nasty. Read our terms of use at the bottom of this page and abide by them.
Watts November 29, 2012 at 11:54 PM
This whole article was nothing more than a way for Joel to pimp his contact info to try and drum up business. Here is a link to the original article: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/baby-bust-continues-us-births-down-4th-041403038.html Even the original article is not well researched or cited. Making teh same vague claim about some unknown "experts" with no actual reference to these experts: "with experts calling it more proof that the weak economy has continued to dampen enthusiasm for having children." What I find more interesting is the other details in the article and what other "experts" may say about those facts. Like the fact that the drop is only in single women and that there was actually a rise in the birth rate for married women. To me this sounds more like people acting more responsibly and possibly being aided in the process by better access to contraceptives and other family planning services. In fact, the same original author wrote an article a month later stating that abortions had declined by 5%, which would also point toward an increase in use of contraceptive methods. But of course, if your agenda is to pimp your financial services, you can take something as obvious as all these figures and turn it into a financial cause and effect.
Alex White November 30, 2012 at 06:09 PM
Good insight. Venture to the lower/western Southeast and the Southwest, particularly California-- specifically the greater L.A. metropolitan area-- then crunch the regional numbers. As far as I can tell, there's no shortage of babies being born in the U.S. to Roman Catholics originally hailing from Mexico and Central America. It's not an uncommon sight to observe a Hispanic mother with two or three kids trailing her, pushing an occupied baby stroller down the sidewalk, and she's pregnant-- and not yet 30! I'm not exaggerating, advocating racist ideologies, or attempting "Swiftian" sarcastic humor. I'm reporting an observable and most likely verifiable trend. I see this familial social pattern every single day around schools and churches, in supermarkets, Laundromats, and on playgrounds and in parks. It's simply amazing. It reminds me of times past when farm families had many, many children so as to maintain a continued supply of cheap and ready labor. My dad's father's family-- 11 children. Our family-- 4 children. My own family-- 1 child. At this point, I can only surmise the proclivity for birthing multiple children during hard economic conditions is both a cultural and religious imperative. So, although birthrates nationwide might be down, in fact, someone somewhere IS having a lot of babies; but it might just be geographically specific and ethnically and culturally inclusive. Now that would be an interesting article to read.
Andrew Polcyn December 15, 2012 at 10:01 PM
The world is now less 22 children. Still stand by that comment, whatever your name will be this week?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »