patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Guns, Arrows: Council Approves Deer Culling Program

Hunting program could start this fall

 

Almost two years after initial discussions were first brought forward concerning culling a growing herd of white-tailed deer in Avon Lake, city council approved legislation allowing hunting, 6-1.

Councilman Larry Meiners cast the lone “no” vote opposing the legislation.

The legislation, which has undergone numerous changes resulting in part from hours of comments —often heated— by the public, now permits culling but only by an appointee by the police department, a qualified city employee or a contractual agent. Culling will be permitted in very specific areas.

The Avon Lake Police Department would oversee the culling program and already have an officer selected as the probable sharpshooter.

Some questions remain, including exactly where sharpshooting can occur. Also not determined is what a proposed 250-foot setback means in terms of hunting area. 

Several maps have been presented with the most recent attached. Several scenarios are being considered to determine what the final hunting map will look like.

“The 250-foot setback has not been determined yet,” Avon Lake Mayor Greg Zilka, who has essentially been given the responsibility of the culling program as the safety director, said.

Zilka said he would be meeting with Avon Lake Police Chief David Owad and the officer assigned to culling on Jan. 15.

The mayor said the culling area would be clearly marked.

Residents, both supporting sharpshooting and opposing the measure, have addressed council numerous times since the city council began discussing how to cull the whitetail deer herd, deemed to large for Avon Lake.

Numerous options, including allowing the public to hunt, sharpshooting by private contractors, birth control for deer, relocation and sterilization in addition to just where culling can occur, were discussed.

Program has supporters and detractors

Councilman Rob James, who is sponsoring the legislation, said he appreciated and took into account all comments, both supporting and opposing a culling program, into account. Bow hunting on private property would be permitted under certain circumstances by a designee of the police department, city appointee or contractual agents.

James said sharpshooting by private contractors was deemed too expensive

Relocation and sterilization were deemed illegal in the state of Ohio.

Contraception was not deemed legal or practical. ODNR does not permit contraception without a reduced deer population, James said.

James said he was worried about property damage by deer and safety of drivers as well as the potential for Lyme’s disease in Avon Lake.

Councilwoman Jennifer Fenderbosch wanted the legislation amended so carcasses would be available for human consumption, possibly to food kitchens.

Councilman Larry Meiners said he supported the measure.

“There’s no way to appease everyone,” Meiners said, noting that he objected to some portion, but felt it was the best legislation possible, then noted he would vote against it.

Meiners said he would vote “yes” only on legislation that included sharpshooters only and not archery so he would be voting no.

Meiners asked what the insurance policy limits were, in the event an injured deer ran off and caused damage. That information was not readily available.

It would be up to the mayor to decide if he would use the bow hunting culling option.

“Hopefully (Zilka) would be able to use other measures first,” James said.

Kos said the issue was controversial in the city and noted about half the population had concerns about hunting.

“I said at the beginning I do not opposed bow hunting, but I oppose hunting in Avon Lake,” Kos said, noting that similar cities, including Westlake, Bay Village and Rocky River have a deer problem, but no culling program.

He said, however, he would support the legislation.

“I am one person with one vote,” Kos said, noting his opposition was outnumbered on council. He credited James with working with him to ensure the legislation was amended to rule out hunting near schools, daycare and churches.

“Do I object, stomp and say ‘no, no, no’ to everything?" Kos asked. “Passing (legislation) was inevitable.”

He said it was more responsible to approve amended legislation that he agreed with, than voting it down and facing the possibility that less agreeable legislation be passed down the road.

Council President Martin O’Donnell wanted the program initiated as soon as possible, expressing concern that an accident resulting in injury or worse was otherwise inevitable. Zilka said it was possible the program could be in place by fall 2013.

Read more on Patch:


Revised Legislation Will Prohibit Hunting Near Schools, Day Care

Deer Hunting Ordinance is Too Broad: Opinion

Gun, Bow Hunting Allowed in Avon Lake?

Tufts University Evaluating Deer Birth Control Option

High-Tech System Could Help Prevent Deer Collisions

Councilman on New Deer Hunting Map: ‘This is Just Dumb’

Deer Problem? Study Used In Count is Flawed (Letter to the Editor)  

‘Bloody Tracks’ and Slow Painful Deaths: PETA Opposes Avon Lake

Bow Hunting 'Save the Deer' Group Forms to Stop Bow Hunting

Deer Feeding Ban Moves Forward in Avon Lake

Poll: Do You Support Controlled Bow Hunting in Avon Lake?

Deer Population Threatening Avon Lake's Metro Park

How to Control the Deer? Take our Poll

                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Topics: Avon Lake, Avon Lake Deer Overpopulation, bow hunting, culling, and sharpshooters

Jen G

7:21 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Unbelievable! I am ashamed to say that I live in this city....this city that I have lived in for over 30 years....this city that I love so much. The council should be ashamed of themselves. I hope when an accident occurs due to the culling, and it will, that each one of those council members is able to live with themselves. This is completely unnecessary legislation and one in which the voices of the voters was not taken into account. Why not send it to a vote? See what the majority of the residence want. I just find this all very disturbing. My only hope is that when these council members are up for re-election, people don't vote for them. It's time we get some people in there that actually care about their constituents and this city. Shame on all of them! The only one with enough guts to vote against it was Larry Meiners....I guess one council member has a heart and a brain.

Deer density statistics (avonlakedeer.com)
Avon Lake has FAR fewer deer than other cities that hunt. ODNR has been telling the pro-hunting faction of council that we should have only 40-50 deer in the entire city - that is 4 deer/sq mile. We can find NO OTHER DNR IN THE UNITED STATES that supports this ridiculous density number and that would lead to the wholesale SLAUGHTER of this community's deer herd!
We are THE most densely populated city amongst other local cities that allow hunting !! How can hunting/culling so close to so many homes ever be safe?

Reply

Laurie

8:25 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

First of all, Jen, it will be on parcels of land 5 acres or more. Second, how about all of the accidents due to deer running in front or into cars? The deer are not healthy - they don't have enough to eat. They scare horses at the 2 riding facilities which cause the horses to throw the riders. Ever hear of Christopher Reeve?

Reply
Comment_arrow

4TH-GENERATION-AVNLKR

8:34 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Hmmm....I live next to one of the riding facilities, never seen or heard of an accident due to a deer. And I have not seen 1 sick deer around here....they are actually nice and plump right now.

Comment_arrow

Jen G

11:13 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

First of all, NO...it can also be on 3 parcels of connecting land that equals 5 acres. You should really know the legislation before commenting on it.
Second, you don't think injured deer will run into the street and cause accidents?? Accidents happen with or without deer. With a little caution and attention to speed limits, they can be avoided. They scare the horses?? Really??? Come on! Should we also kill the dogs that might scare the horses?? Or the squirrels?? Cats??
Shame on all of you that support the slaughter of the HARMLESS, yes I said harmless, deer. You all make me sick!

Comment_arrow

Lisa Fields

9:52 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Laurie, the city of Avon Lake was offered a grant by NOACA for a proven method which prevents deer-vehicle-accidents called DeerDeter but they rejected that. Of course Jennifer Fenderbosch had her husband, the great white hunter, pushing this entire thing from the getgo so he and his hunting buddies could turn Avon Lake into their own private hunting preserve. The reputation of Avon Lake is now in the toilet. Laurie, you really need to be educated. The deer are not starving and I am a life-long horse person and have never been on a horse spooked by a deer.

4TH-GENERATION-AVNLKR

8:29 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Poor deer, they didn't do anything to deserve this. The people that build and buy these outrageous homes are the ones that don't like them. Get over yourself and your precious landscaping...it was their home first.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MZ

9:15 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Just for clarification, what if someone had a non-outrageous house and didn't like the deer?

Comment_arrow

Kimber Malloy

1:52 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

He means he lives in 45's and we Rich People (non 45 or fay/vineyard types) run the town and the politicians. Plus its always a conspiracy-ALWAYS

Comment_arrow

Jen G

1:59 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Wow, Kim...that was rather pompous, pretentious thing to say.

Avon-Laker

8:50 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

From my point of view something had to be done. I'm not sure why contraception is illegal in Ohio, but if it is, the city had very few options. Understanding it is not an easy choice, I am glad they took action to do something. It can always be reviewed at a later date.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Stevens

1:06 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Kimberly, as I see it there really is only a few "Rich" people that live in Avon Lake? I don't know what you consider "Rich", but I'm sure it's nowhere near what rich is! Stick to the subject!

Hugh Hendry

9:04 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I, like Jen G am ashamed of this city and it's council. I also hope those members are voted out during the next election. This legislation was based on lies and a narrow, self serving interpretation of the term "over-population." Everything I've been exposed to on this issue left me with the feeling that lies, half truths, and self serving people were having at it for their dubious reasoning. Too many people, not too many deer is the problem. What a stupid solution to a non-problem, good luck living this one down Avon Lake, no wonder we've become the laughing stock of Northern Ohio. Hunters have their way again! Stupidity has found a safe haven in Avon Lake, sheltered by an equally stupid, non-thinking city council! Its a very sad day!
Hugh Hendry

Reply
Comment_arrow

MZ

9:13 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Hugh, should we be culling people instead of the deer?

Comment_arrow

Jen G

11:14 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Great comment, Hugh! Perfectly said!!

Kristi

10:09 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I agree with Jen and am horrified that I now live in a city that allows deer hunting. I never, ever would have moved to AL had I known this was a possibility. Also, Laurie, please get your facts straight. The ordinance allows hunting not just on parcels 5 acres or more but allows hunting on 3 combined parcels that total 5 acres or more. Big difference. If other are truly angered by this, REMEBER IT WHEN RE-ELECTION TIME COMES AND BE SURE NOT TO VOTE FOR COUNCILMEMBERS WHO PASSED THIS RIDICULOUS, UNNECESSARY, RECKLESS, AND DANGEROUS LAW.

Reply

Jen G

11:21 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I guess we should all invest in some bullet proof jackets and windows! Please don't respond about how people can't be hurt and how safe hunting is....IT ISN'T safe in a densely populated area.

Reply

Hugh Hendry

11:23 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

MZ - have you ever given thought to the possibility that Avon Lake is/has been over built??? All those ticky tacky houses require that old forest land be destroyed; now the inhabitants of those horrible track homes want the wild life to be destroyed in order to stumble through their sad, dull lives at the expense of nature's ceations. What a mess this town has become. To be more concise and hopefully answer your less than thoughtful question, culling people is illegal, destroying forest land to build horrible little houses should not only be illegal but stopped. Is that a simple enough explanation for you to understand??

Reply
Comment_arrow

MZ

7:45 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Hugh,

Sad, dull lives? Project much? If you really feel this town is such a mess, who is keeping you here? If you want to stay and make change, why not run for office, start a petition, something... Instead you project your feelings and assumptions on everyone else. There is more land (way more) in this country that is undeveloped than land that has been developed.

Thanks for calling me simple. Keep in mind you have no idea about me, my experience, my make up. Your assumptions based on little to no knowledge say much more about you than they do about me.

Patch reader

11:59 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

"Bow hunting on private property would be permitted under certain circumstances by a designee of the police department, city appointee or contractual agents."

I hope the police dept will be taking precautions to deal with those deer that aren't felled by the first shot/arrow.

Reply

Cheryl Lister

12:16 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Last spring I counted 9 deer on their hind legs, eating the buds off my maple trees less than 100 feet from my house. Last week I had to honk at several deer in my driveway, so that I could exit my drive onto Avon Belden. Just sayin'.
Cheryl Lister

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen G

12:24 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

And??? Since when is seeing wildlife in your yard a reason for allowing hunting??

Kathleen O'Brien Wilhelm

12:45 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Thank you council for approving this ordinance--the safety of humans over animals must be top priority. Please get this culling done today; not next year. . Deer have destroyed vegetation, caused disease and killed and or maimed humans. It was said that the number of traffic accidents with deer in Avon Lake have been reduced, but the reporting is the issue. Deer have destroyed two of my cars, but thankfully not hurt me or my passengers--both in Avon Lake while driving below the speed limit. Motorists have gone left of center just missing my car to avoid a deer. None of these incidents have been reported. THE SAFETY of humans must be a priority in Avon Lake. Deer meat is a nutrious meal and the soup kitchens will appreciate. Those who think deer are all bambi; go look at the destruction that deer have caused and will continue. Re birth control; seriously? Hunters killing a deer for meat might ingest this poison. Again, thank you leaders, but now please get 'er done today.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen G

12:52 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Kathleen, it takes a "special" person to be ok with killing an animal for the sake of their landscaping. I hope you don't have any children, or grandchildren that will be hurt or killed by a hunter. Your landscaping won't seem so important then. No deer in Avon Lake has killed or maimed anyone nor have they caused disease. Who says that the humans will now be safe in Avon Lake?? Get real!! Your view on all of this is disgusting, inaccurate and inhumane.

cindy eging

12:50 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I agree with no culling, Why is it illegal for birth control? This seems to be the most humane way of dealing with our overpopulation of houses in these cities. I agree and always say that it was their home first.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa Fields

9:59 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

The reason immuno-contraception for deer in Ohio is illegal and will never be approved, per Scott Peters with the ODNR, is because the division of wildlife, who is a state-run hunting club doesn't want less deer, they want more deer for the gun which sells more hunting licenses which pays their salaries and 401K's. They know that hunting causes a rebound effect which makes for more deer. They are desperate since hunting in this country is on the decline. Desperate people will say and do anything.

Kimber Malloy

1:47 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

None of you who threaten to Vote out this Council even votes-and as for deer, yea its too bad but they kill MORE people than all the other natural wildlife. Do we wait until Jen and her family or worse me and MINE die in a head to head car wreck on Walker from herds of deer running out? And yes i watch for them-does every other driver i pass? Heck they ran into a police car on Jaycox-Lori posted the video. Yes they were here first, now we are-otherwise call the Native americans and we can open one HUGE casino here! Start Hunting Avon Lake (yes i have been here a long time also-not a newbie like most above in bridgeside, westwinds, Waterside......

Reply

Jen G

1:54 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I don't vote??? Really?? I have voted in every single election since turning 18. So, please don't speak of things that you have no idea about. Do we wait until Kimber's family is injured or killed by a hunter or by an injured deer running into traffic?? Accidents happen! If you don't like or want wildlife, you should have moved to a place like Lorain where gunshots and bloodshed are commonplace.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kimber Malloy

2:29 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Last i read, North RIdgeville, solon, mentor and one other (i forget) ARE culling and i haven't seen and people with arrows or gunshots or the bambi lovers up in arms because they are resonable people. I welcome the hunters in my backyard. Not one person on this Council (and i agree there all bad) will be out of his position, heck they run un-opposed. Good for voting, but they take do NOT your threats to heart at all. This Council should have just DONE it, woulda been better and prolly mostly done by now. I'll keep track of dead and injured people from culling and post it in 6 months-i bet its ZERO. Count how many car wrecks from deer, will be ALOT more than zero! Pompous? i think satirical because more comments you read here it is ALWAYS a conspiracy and Rich people ruining Avon Lake. GO complain about the upcoming school levy or MOVE i say.

Anna

2:35 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

This should have been voted on “by the people.” It should not have been voted on by the so-called “representatives” of the people. Council’s vote clearly does not represent the people when, “about half the population had concerns about hunting” as noted above. God watch over us when an errant bullet flies. It is unbelievable how this council operates. Next, they are going to want to license trash collectors!!

Reply

Jen G

2:38 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I never said anything about a conspiracy nor about rich people ruining the city. North Ridgeville, Solon, Mentor, Avon, and many others have a much lower population per square mile.....by far. I'm sure the council could care less about my vote. They made it clear that they don't care about anyone's vote. Nobody has been killed by a deer in Avon Lake. This is completely unnecessary and dangerous.

Reply

French Swede

3:01 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Folks who object to deer culling make note that the deer were here first. One hundred years ago there were close to zero deer in Ohio. Today there are 700 to 750,000 deer on the loose here. Every area in the world that has had a problem with wildlife overpopulation has had to resort to culling. You name it--elephants, monkeys, rabbits, raccoons rats, birds, practically every species you can think of has needed thinning when they become a nusiance. It's a sad situation when animals need to be killed for the good of the herd and the good of the folks who are affected by their overabundance. The reality is, controlled hunting is the safest and most effective way out of the problem. The time to do it is when there is still undeveloped land open enough to allow it. Think pragmatically and with less emotion, and you'll see the light.

Reply

Jen G

3:15 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I'll never see the need for this in such a densely populated city.

Reply

Kathleen O'Brien Wilhelm

9:10 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

N. Ridgeville, Mentor, Solon among other cities see the importance of culling deer and have done it waaaaaaay ahead of Avon Lake, but thankfully Avon Lake is taking leadership to protect humans, vegetation and prevent disease. da

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa Fields

10:10 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Yes, and Solon has spent way over one million dollars on a failed plan and will continue to do so because as their Ph.D wildlife biologist, hired gun said, "killing deer is like mowing the lawn. Once you start it it will have to continue." This is due to the undeniable and well-documented rebound effect. In non-hunted areas there are far less deer. Solon had many lawsuits, neighbors who were at one time the best of friends no longer speak, children witnessed the plastic bags being put over the deer's heads who had been shot and were suffocated when the bullets didn't finish the job, every single promised safety measure was broken, corruption runs rampant there and in every single city where irresponsible councils pass ordinances which allow lethal weapons to be discharged in the town. In other towns deer have caused deer-vehicle-accidents. When they are hit they run off in a panic and into roadways. Many people have found dead deer on their property and some with the does fawns standing by. This has nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics. Alas, I fear you are uneducable Kathleen and just filled with hatred and bigotry.

Jen G

9:26 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Again...N.Ridgeville, Mentor, Solon are MUCH less densely populated. Humans aren't in any danger, who the hell cares about the landscaping, and what disease has been caused, in Avon Lake, by the deer??

Reply

George Z

9:36 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Dear Jen G -

Why do you have to jump all over people you disagree with? It's OK to disagree with this vote but "shame us all" is a bit high & mighty - isn't it? If you would go in the back of the wood behind the Landings and you would see fenced off area's. The purpose of such enclosures is to see what plant life would grow w/o being munched on. It is drastic. We do have a problem! Many folks have had accidents (including one of our own policemen while on duty). It will only get worse if we do nothing. I hate to see deer killed, but it's a matter of time before they cause a fatal auto accident (already causing numerous accidents).

Reply

Jen G

10:05 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I don't believe I jumped on anyone! I am simply stating my opinion and reasons for it. I've seen the fenced off areas.... I've also seen 30 years of building which has also destroyed vegetation. However, I'm not concerned with the vegetation....I'm concerned with the safety of the PEOPLE in Avon Lake. I also never said that "nothing" should be done to control the deer population. I just feel that there are other, less dangerous methods to at least try first!

Reply

AL2003

12:51 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Wow. Miss Wilhelm sure is intimidated by families of deer.

Deer who are just trying to provide for their babies.

Instead of her contempt & cruelty, wouldn't it be nice if she was merciful toward creatures who are weaker and "dumber" than her ?

Proverbs 14:31

He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Orchid

1:33 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

AL2003

That proverbs passage is about poor people, not animals.

God Gave Man Dominion Over Animals
Genesis 1:26-28
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

tori

9:54 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Here's an idea.

Lower the speed limit throughout ALL of Avon Lake and enforce it !

Everyone is familiar with the 35MPH on Crocker extension (between Center Ridge and Lorain Rd) Many think it's ridiculous since other similar roads are 45+ but because the speed is ENFORCED, most people drive it safely.

Lower AL to *20 MPH* and ENFORCE it ! It is primarily a bedroom community - suburb. No one should be in THAT much of a hurry to speed through the city. SLOW DOWN and considerably less deer-auto accidents will occur. Here's a novel idea: perhaps even OtHER types of accidents will lessen too!

Reply

tori

9:56 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Oh yeah, and make it illegal to be on cell-phones in AL !! Staying off the phone and actually concentrating on driving would also lessen ALL types of accidents !!

(it's not rocket science LOL)

Reply

Phil

12:11 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Here's an idea: How about we just introduce mountain lions to Avon Lake?

Thats absurd you say? Let's think about it for a second. The mountain lions would surely take care of the deer "problem" (quotes).

But what happens when the mountain lions become over populated and take over the city? Well, hopefully a few of the people from this post will go out in their yards and try to shoo them away from their precious azaleas with a broom. Then, we would not only solve the deer problem...but we would also start a lovely nature inspired culling program for stupid people.

Reply

Cheryl Lister

3:46 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

to Jen G- you're correct about wildlife in my yard not being a reason to kill, however I don't want my landscaping/ garden to be ruined. I don't want to have to wait to exit my drive and I believe it is more humane to thin the herd than to let the deer starve to death. I have a close friend who has had Lyme disease for 10 plus years. There is no cure and she has been in a living hell for many years. The disease is a result of a DEER tick bite. This is the main reason I don't want deer anywhere near me or those I love. By the way, do you live anywhere near a heavy deer population?
Disease for 10 plus years

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen G

7:27 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

You don't want to have to wait to exit your drive?? The deer are not starving to death in Avon Lake. Nature has a way of taking care of itself. Of course I don't want to see anyone get Lyme Disease. How many cases of Lyme Disease do we have in Avon Lake? I actually DO live near a heavy deer population....right across the street from one of the few wooded areas left in AL. I love seeing the deer and it's actually not as often as some have reported. Sometimes weeks go by and I don't see any.
I don't want people hurt, but I certainly don't want to see deer being killed because of peoples landscaping/gardening.

Jen G

7:32 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The city of Solon, Ohio is referenced as a "success" story by deer-culling advocates. That city has had a deer-culling program each year since 2005, without a statistically credible decrease in their deer population or reduction in damage. Solon intends to continue to increase the number of deer killed in 2009 in reaction to complaints about residential landscaping damage from feeding deer. These complaints and vehicle-deer accidents continue despite having killed more than 1000 deer in this period, at a cost to that city of more than $750,000. Solon's program is also part of a greater regional culling effort which includes Cuyahoga County and Cleveland Metroparks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tori girl

2:00 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Can you imagine what could be done with $750K in the community?? The schools come to mind, as do many other things. That money could be used in a much better way than trying to keep up with the deer.

Make the speed limit 25 and also illegal to use mobile phones, and enforce both. The number of accidents should lessen dramatically.

Next thing you know, SQUIRRELS will be targeted! Maybe as they should be??!!

I have never seen so many in my life. They get into our garage occasionally during the winter months too. They are dirty, disease carrying rodents and I sure hope they don't bite one of my little ones.

Shall we send out sharp-shooters for them also?

Jen G

2:32 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Oh, and what about the raccoons!? They get into the garbage when we put it out and make a mess. They can transmit rabies.....shoot the little nuisances! And the drunk drivers that cause accidents....get the gun!

Reply
Comment_arrow

ellyn

11:11 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Yes!
After the deer, lets do it --

-squirrels
-racoons
-BIRDS!!!?
Why not!?? They crap all over our lovely newly decorated patio! Yuck, get them out of here!!

Where will it end people? Kill every living thing until the place is as barren as the moon?

Obviously being sarcastic but really, where will it end?

We're fairly new residents of this community and one reason we chose it was BECAUSE of the deer. They make it more homey,with a warmer vibe, less cookie-cutter, Peaceful.
But with bullets flying, where is the peace? What do we tell our kids when they see dead deer? Or hear bullets flying?They're fearful enough with all the talk of guns, shooting, Newtown. Do you really want to add this fear to their innocent minds??

Of course collisions with deer are a concern. Slowing down as others said, issue fines for using phones when driving. How many near misses are there do to people texting or talking while driving?

Landscaping? Really? You're willing to injure a human when a bullet goes
astray and hits a child running through the woods? A child who didn't get the memo that bullets would be flying? Really? Are you prepared to deal with that?

Realtors: Will you tell clients to watch where they walk because they may be shot?

Will AL post neon signs at entrances:
WARNING: SHOOTING IN PROGRESS. DON'T LEAVE VEHICLE OR HOME.

Oh wait, bullets go through car and home windows. Nice.

What kind of place is this anyway??

Lee Williams

5:52 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

City councilpersons should be asked if they or their spouses are bow hunters. Bow-hunting is the cruelest form of hunting. Statistics show that more than 50% of deer shot with arrows are merely wounded, and that the majority of these escape to die protracted and agonizing deaths from infection, a process that lasts for up to two weeks. Human decency demands that there be no bow hunt in Avon Lake. For those who insist on it, they choose to ignore these facts and condone cruelty. Let them be known as animal abusers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ellyn

11:16 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

I agree. There's nothing as lovely as stumbling over a deer dying a slow death. How cruel. What a sight for kids to see, for anyone to see.

What happens when someone's beloved pet dog runs inbetween the bullet and deer? While dogs are supposed to be kept in yards, it happens. What then AL?

How much extra insurance must AL carry to deal with potential humans or pets being shot by mistake??

Where are the proof sources that our community can't support / feed the deer? They seem healthy to us.

Cheryl Lister

10:47 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013

One case of Lyme's disease is too many.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen G

11:32 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013

And so is one accident from a stray bullet.

Kimber Malloy

7:57 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

we have a gun range for like the past 50 years-don't recall any dead people or stray bullets from that, of course the newbies complain and now they don't shoot as often. we should cull all the subdivision people AND the deer so i won't have to listen to Jen g types AND the woods will normal and maybe even grow a garden. Thats what Avon Lake needs-slow death or not. Reading these idiots IS a slow death. let the Killing begin!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen G

8:15 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

...and MY point is proven!

Kimber Malloy

10:13 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Were Killing deer-LIVE with it-and thank GOD we are, go complain about the lifeflight helicopter and the noise it makes!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jen G

10:36 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Obviously I have to live with it, right? Who is complaining about helicoper noise?? That's as ridiculous as complaining about the deer eating their landscaping. I guess I can only hope that a bullet does go astray....and towards you pompous, cold, and IGNORANT people. The sad thing is, as Solon found out, all of this will not reduce the deer population...just put people in danger.

ramona padilla-dus

5:28 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

those of us who have lived in Avon Lake a Looooong time, know that we have an explosion of deer... and I don't care how careful a driver you are,... especially during rut, if a deer pops into the road unexpectedly, it's pretty hard to avoid, no matter how slowly you're going... I regularly (almost every day) see 4 deer in my backyard... I enjoy wildlife tremendously, but there comes a time when you have to be realistic about a problem. I used to grow lovely flowers in my yard.... now the deer get almost all of them, whether perennial or annual.. trying to grow a garden?? good luck!!! I do wish council would allow those who live on the lake to hunt on our own property provided we're aiming towards the lake.... I could easily take the 4 who frequent my lawn.... if you want the deer in your yard, fine... plant some corn and feed them all you want... the rest of us would like to enjoy garden (whether it be flower or vegetable) and driving down the road without having to battle the deer.

Reply

Leave a comment